Power rankings
All 32 teams ranked by BBMI Rating, our strength rating: expected points margin against an average opponent on a neutral field. Projected records and the simulated playoff odds come from full-season simulations.
| ▴ | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0-1 | +7.0 | .688 | 11.7–5.3 | 9.0–14.0 | 88% | 59% | 15.8% | |
| 2 | 1-0 | +5.6 | .671 | 11.4–5.6 | 9.0–14.0 | 87% | 57% | 10.8% | |
| 3 | 1-0 | +5.2 | .635 | 10.8–6.2 | 8.0–13.0 | 82% | 65% | 9.1% | |
| 4 | 1-0 | +4.8 | .676 | 11.5–5.5 | 9.0–14.0 | 86% | 60% | 9.7% | |
| 5 | 1-0 | +4.8 | .624 | 10.6–6.4 | 8.0–13.0 | 72% | 24% | 7.6% | |
| 6 | 1-0 | +3.6 | .600 | 10.2–6.8 | 8.0–13.0 | 66% | 17% | 4.3% | |
| 7 | 1-0 | +3.4 | .647 | 11.0–6.0 | 8.5–13.5 | 82% | 38% | 6.5% | |
| 8 | 0-0 | +3.4 | .600 | 10.2–6.8 | 8.0–12.5 | 70% | 38% | 4.8% | |
| 9 | 1-0 | +3.2 | .612 | 10.4–6.6 | 8.0–13.0 | 72% | 56% | 5.1% | |
| 10 | 0-1 | +3.2 | .588 | 10.0–7.0 | 7.5–12.5 | 69% | 35% | 4.2% | |
| 11 | 0-1 | +3.2 | .576 | 9.8–7.2 | 7.0–12.0 | 63% | 26% | 3.7% | |
| 12 | 0-1 | +2.8 | .571 | 9.7–7.3 | 7.0–12.0 | 55% | 17% | 2.9% | |
| 13 | 0-0 | +2.6 | .576 | 9.8–7.2 | 7.0–12.0 | 63% | 36% | 3.4% | |
| 14 | 0-1 | +2.6 | .576 | 9.8–7.2 | 7.0–12.0 | 67% | 59% | 3.7% | |
| 15 | 1-0 | +1.6 | .547 | 9.3–7.7 | 7.0–12.0 | 47% | 18% | 2.1% | |
| 16 | 0-1 | +1.4 | .529 | 9.0–8.0 | 6.5–11.5 | 43% | 30% | 1.6% | |
| 17 | 1-0 | +0.8 | .512 | 8.7–8.3 | 6.0–11.0 | 43% | 23% | 1.2% | |
| 18 | 1-0 | 0.0 | .494 | 8.4–8.6 | 6.0–11.0 | 30% | 6% | 0.7% | |
| 19 | 1-0 | -0.6 | .476 | 8.1–8.9 | 6.0–11.0 | 29% | 4% | 0.6% | |
| 20 | 0-1 | -0.8 | .465 | 7.9–9.1 | 5.0–10.5 | 37% | 28% | 0.7% | |
| 21 | 0-1 | -1.6 | .459 | 7.8–9.2 | 5.0–10.0 | 27% | 15% | 0.4% | |
| 22 | 0-1 | -1.8 | .482 | 8.2–8.8 | 6.0–11.0 | 43% | 39% | 0.5% | |
| 23 | 0-1 | -1.8 | .424 | 7.2–9.8 | 5.0–10.0 | 15% | 6% | 0.1% | |
| 24 | 1-0 | -2.2 | .424 | 7.2–9.8 | 5.0–10.0 | 15% | 8% | 0.1% | |
| 25 | 0-1 | -3.0 | .394 | 6.7–10.3 | 4.0–9.0 | 17% | 16% | 0.1% | |
| 26 | 0-1 | -3.2 | .394 | 6.7–10.3 | 4.0–9.0 | 17% | 18% | 0.1% | |
| 27 | 0-1 | -4.6 | .359 | 6.1–10.9 | 4.0–8.5 | 7% | 3% | 0.0% | |
| 28 | 1-0 | -5.6 | .341 | 5.8–11.2 | 3.5–8.0 | 4% | 1% | 0.0% | |
| 29 | 1-0 | -6.6 | .341 | 5.8–11.2 | 3.5–8.0 | 4% | 1% | 0.0% | |
| 30 | 0-1 | -6.6 | .324 | 5.5–11.5 | 3.0–8.0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0% | |
| 31 | 0-1 | -9.6 | .206 | 3.5–13.5 | 1.5–5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0.0% | |
| 32 | 1-0 | -10.4 | .182 | 3.1–13.9 | 1.0–5.0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0% |
Showing 32 of 32 NFL teams. BBMI Rating = strength rating in net points/game vs an average opponent (the ranking key; opponent-adjusted in-season, market-anchored preseason); Proj W = mean simulated wins (schedule-dependent, tiebreaker only); Win Range = 80% interval (10th–90th percentile); Playoff / Div / SB are simulated postseason probabilities. Preseason basis: market win-total prior + 2025 QB depth charts, so teams resolve into rating tiers before Week 1.
How the BBMI preseason rankings are built
Ranked on a strength rating, not on wins. Teams are ordered by BBMI Rating — the model’s expected points margin per game against an average opponent on a neutral field. We deliberately do not rank on projected wins: two equally strong teams finish with different win totals purely because their schedules differ, so wins are a poor strength measure. Wins only break ties inside a rating tier.
Preseason basis — rating tiers. Team strength is anchored to the market win-total prior (which reflects each team’s schedule) and 2025 QB depth charts. Because no 2026 games have been played, the rating carries talent but little separation, so teams resolve into a handful of rating tiers rather than 32 distinct values. Announced Week-1 starters are folded in during late August, and the rating updates off real opponent-adjusted results (EPA) once the season begins — sharpening the tiers into a continuous, opponent-adjusted strength ranking.
Projected odds. A separate set of 20,000 full-season simulations translates that strength and each team’s actual schedule into projected wins, playoff, division-title, and Super Bowl probabilities, plus an 80% win-total range (10th–90th percentile).
This is a preseason projection. Opponent-adjusted efficiency (EPA) columns return once the 2026 season is under way and games have been played.
From the Research Desk
All research →Detroit Is the NFC North Favorite. The First Month Will Test It.
Jared Goff and one of the NFL’s best offenses give Detroit a championship ceiling. A rebuilt offensive line and four games without Brian Branch and Kerby Joseph give it an immediate problem. BBMI rates the Lions fourth of 32 at +4.8, projects 11.5–5.5 with an 86% playoff chance, and makes them 60% to win the division.
#4 of 32 · +4.8 · 11.5–5.5 projected · 86% playoffs · 60% NFC NorthNFL · Season PreviewWhy Plus-22 Is Unlikely to Repeat: Chicago’s 2026 Season, by the Numbers
Chicago won the NFC North at 11–6 behind the best turnover margin in football, and two defenders who accounted for 15 of those 33 takeaways are gone. Pro Football Reference put the Bears at 9.1 expected wins; they won 11. BBMI rates Chicago +1.6, 15th of 32, and projects 9.3–7.7 with a 47% playoff chance — first team out of the projected NFC field.
#15 of 32 · +1.6 · 9.3–7.7 projected · 47% playoffs · 18% NFC NorthNFL · Season PreviewA Good Defense and a $1.3 Million Quarterback: Minnesota's 2026 Season, by the Numbers
Minnesota rated 6th in defensive EPA and 22nd on offense in 2025, started three quarterbacks, and missed the playoffs by the width of a Green Bay tie. BBMI projects 8.4-8.6 in 2026, last in a division it likes all three rivals in, with Kyler Murray signed for the veteran minimum to make the passing game functional enough for the defense to matter.
#18 of 32 · 0.0 · 8.4–8.6 projected · 30% playoffs · 6% NFC North