BBMI Rankings.
All 365 Division I teams, rated by BBMI’s predictive model — efficiency, shooting, schedule strength, and historical accuracy. The BBMI score is the projected margin against an average team on a neutral floor; KenPom, NET, and the AP Top 25 are shown for reference.
| Rank | Team | Conf | BBMI | Record | KenPom | NET | AP | SOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B10 | 33.63 | 34-3 | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | |
| 2 | B12 | 33.57 | 35-2 | 2 | 3 | — | 3 | |
| 3 | ACC | 32.77 | 35-2 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | |
| 4 | B10 | 29.92 | 30-8 | 8 | 9 | — | 9 | |
| 5 | B10 | 29.80 | 27-8 | 4 | 8 | — | 8 | |
| 6 | B10 | 29.80 | 27-8 | 9 | 11 | — | 11 | |
| 7 | B10 | 29.37 | 28-7 | 16 | 14 | — | 14 | |
| 8 | SEC | 29.14 | 27-8 | 6 | 4 | — | 4 | |
| 9 | B12 | 28.46 | 29-8 | 7 | 6 | — | 6 | |
| 10 | B12 | 28.46 | 30-7 | 5 | 5 | — | 5 | |
| 11 | WCC | 28.46 | 31-4 | 15 | 7 | — | 7 | |
| 12 | BE | 27.97 | 30-7 | 14 | 16 | — | 16 | |
| 13 | SEC | 27.96 | 27-9 | 12 | 13 | — | 13 | |
| 14 | BE | 27.95 | 32-5 | 10 | 10 | — | 10 | |
| 15 | SEC | 27.74 | 28-9 | 18 | 15 | — | 15 | |
| 16 | ACC | 27.21 | 30-6 | 17 | 12 | — | 12 | |
| 17 | SEC | 27.06 | 25-11 | 11 | 20 | — | 20 | |
| 18 | B12 | 26.61 | 24-11 | 21 | 21 | — | 21 | |
| 19 | MWC | 26.56 | 29-7 | 27 | 26 | — | 26 | |
| 20 | WCC | 26.55 | 27-6 | 26 | 22 | — | 22 | |
| 21 | B10 | 26.42 | 24-12 | 28 | 30 | — | 30 | |
| 22 | ACC | 26.22 | 24-11 | 19 | 17 | — | 17 | |
| 23 | A10 | 26.22 | 29-6 | 34 | 31 | — | 31 | |
| 24 | SEC | 26.09 | 25-10 | 13 | 18 | — | 18 | |
| 25 | B10 | 26.07 | 24-12 | 22 | 27 | — | 27 |
Showing 25 of 365 D-I teams, filterable by conference and Top-N. AP Top 25 via ESPN, updated weekly. Green/red rows are teams BBMI rates more than 10 spots away from the KenPom/NET/AP consensus.
How the BBMI basketball model rates teams
Efficiency and shooting. The model weighs offensive and defensive efficiency, shooting quality, rebounding, and ball security — what translates in single-elimination play, not raw record.
Schedule and home court. The neutral-floor rating strips out home advantage and schedule strength, so two same-record teams aren’t treated as equal.
This is the same engine that prices the spread and total — BBMI’s largest validated record. (KenPom, NET, and AP are independent third-party references shown for context.)