Power rankings
All 365 Division I teams ranked by BBMI rating, the model’s projected scoring margin against an average opponent on a neutral floor.
| ▴ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  MichiganB10 | 34-3 | 33.63 | 1 | 2 | — | 2 |
| 2 |  ArizonaB12 | 35-2 | 33.57 | 2 | 3 | — | 3 |
| 3 |  DukeACC | 35-2 | 32.77 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 |
| 4 |  PurdueB10 | 30-8 | 29.92 | 8 | 9 | — | 9 |
| 5 |  IllinoisB10 | 27-8 | 29.80 | 4 | 8 | — | 8 |
| 6 |  Michigan StateB10 | 27-8 | 29.80 | 9 | 11 | — | 11 |
| 7 |  NebraskaB10 | 28-7 | 29.37 | 16 | 14 | — | 14 |
| 8 |  FloridaSEC | 27-8 | 29.14 | 6 | 4 | — | 4 |
| 9 |  Iowa StateB12 | 29-8 | 28.46 | 7 | 6 | — | 6 |
| 10 |  HoustonB12 | 30-7 | 28.46 | 5 | 5 | — | 5 |
| 11 |  GonzagaWCC | 31-4 | 28.46 | 15 | 7 | — | 7 |
| 12 |  St. John'sBE | 30-7 | 27.97 | 14 | 16 | — | 16 |
| 13 |  VanderbiltSEC | 27-9 | 27.96 | 12 | 13 | — | 13 |
| 14 |  UConnBE | 32-5 | 27.95 | 10 | 10 | — | 10 |
| 15 |  ArkansasSEC | 28-9 | 27.74 | 18 | 15 | — | 15 |
| 16 |  VirginiaACC | 30-6 | 27.21 | 17 | 12 | — | 12 |
| 17 |  TennesseeSEC | 25-11 | 27.06 | 11 | 20 | — | 20 |
| 18 |  KansasB12 | 24-11 | 26.61 | 21 | 21 | — | 21 |
| 19 |  Utah StateMWC | 29-7 | 26.56 | 27 | 26 | — | 26 |
| 20 |  Saint Mary'sWCC | 27-6 | 26.55 | 26 | 22 | — | 22 |
| 21 |  UCLAB10 | 24-12 | 26.42 | 28 | 30 | — | 30 |
| 22 |  LouisvilleACC | 24-11 | 26.22 | 19 | 17 | — | 17 |
| 23 |  Saint LouisA10 | 29-6 | 26.22 | 34 | 31 | — | 31 |
| 24 |  AlabamaSEC | 25-10 | 26.09 | 13 | 18 | — | 18 |
| 25 |  IowaB10 | 24-12 | 26.07 | 22 | 27 | — | 27 |
Showing 25 of 365 D-I teams, filterable by conference and Top-N. AP Top 25 via ESPN, updated weekly. Green/red rows are teams BBMI rates more than 10 spots away from the KenPom/NET/AP consensus.
How the BBMI basketball model rates teams
Efficiency and shooting. The model weighs offensive and defensive efficiency, shooting quality, rebounding, and ball security — what translates in single-elimination play, not raw record.
Schedule and home court. The neutral-floor rating strips out home advantage and schedule strength, so two same-record teams aren’t treated as equal.
This is the same engine that prices the spread and total — BBMI’s largest validated record. (KenPom, NET, and AP are independent third-party references shown for context.)