Team Pages/B10/Illinois
Illinois logo
B10 • 2025–26 SEASON

Illinois

Record 27-8vs line 7–9 ATSLast L 62–71 at UConnTournament 3 seed, Final Four
#5
BBMI rank
+29.8
Rating
#4
KenPom
#8
NET
Illinois logo
Illinois
#5 • +29.8 • B10
SAT APR 4
62 71
final score
UConn
#14 • +27.9neutral
UConn logo
-5.5
Model line
-1.5
Market line
+4.0
Edge · Tracked ATS
70%
Win probability
Illinois 70%UConn 30%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
Jackson State logovs Jackson State
W 113–55#356
Nov 8
Florida Gulf Coast logovs Florida Gulf Coast
W 113–70#218
Nov 12
Texas Tech logovs Texas Tech
W 81–77#43
Nov 15
Colgate logovs Colgate
W 84–65#182
Nov 20
Alabama logovs Alabama
L 86–90#24
Nov 22
L
vs LIU
W 98–58#193
Nov 25
Texas-RGV logovs Texas-RGV
W 87–73#93
Nov 28
UConn logoat UConn
L 61–74#14
Dec 6
Tennessee logoat Tennessee
W 75–62#17
Dec 9
Ohio State logoat Ohio State
W 88–80#27
Dec 13
Nebraska logovs Nebraska
L 80–83#7
Dec 22
Missouri logovs Missouri
W 91–48#91
Dec 29
Southern logovs Southern
W 90–55#249
Jan 3
Penn State logoat Penn State
W 73–65#21590–6893%
Jan 8
Rutgers logovs Rutgers
W 81–55#20787–6699%
Jan 11
Iowa logoat Iowa
W 75–69#2579–7357%
Jan 14
Northwestern logoat Northwestern
W 79–68#6483–7069%
Jan 17
Minnesota logovs Minnesota
W 77–67#7782–6690%
Jan 21
Maryland logovs Maryland
W 89–70#28287–6599%
Jan 24
Purdue logoat Purdue
W 88–82#480–7929%
Jan 29
Washington logovs Washington
W 75–66#7183–7092%
Feb 1
Nebraska logoat Nebraska
W 78–69#775–7140%
Feb 4
Northwestern logovs Northwestern
W 84–44#6484–6993%
Feb 7
Michigan State logoat Michigan State
L 82–85#676–7434%
Feb 10
Wisconsin logovs Wisconsin
L 90–92#2684–7583%
Feb 15
Indiana logovs Indiana
W 71–51#4284–7185%
Feb 18
USC logoat USC
W 101–65#8584–6973%
Feb 21
UCLA logoat UCLA
L 94–95#2181–7454%
Feb 27
Michigan logovs Michigan
L 70–84#175–7959%
Mar 3
Oregon logovs Oregon
W 80–54#15085–6697%
Mar 8
Maryland logoat Maryland
W 78–72#28286–6697%
Mar 13
Wisconsin logovs Wisconsin
L 88–91#2683–7573%
Mar 19
Pennsylvania logovs Pennsylvania
W 105–70#14287–6584%
Mar 21
VCU logovs VCU
W 76–55#3383–7279%
Mar 26
Houston logovs Houston
W 65–55#1072–7373%
Mar 28
Iowa logovs Iowa
W 71–59#2579–7279%
Apr 4
UConn logovs UConn
L 62–71#1475–7270%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#2#5#8#11#12
#5
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
3
Seed
South
Region
Final Four
Finish
The bracket is resolved, so this is the result rather than a probability. It becomes an odds card again when the file carries fractions.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#8
KenPom rank#4
NET rank#8
Quality wins103.0#5
Rebound margin+9.6#7
Turnover margin-1.1#249
Assists per game14.5#110
Three-point margin+0.042#42
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Illinois

2025–26 • ATS
33
Picks on Illinois
46
Picks against
-2.6u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 16 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.