Team Pages/B12/Houston
Houston logo
B12 • 2025–26 SEASON

Houston

Record 30-7vs line 12–10 ATSLast L 55–65 vs IllinoisTournament 2 seed, Sweet 16
#10
BBMI rank
+28.5
Rating
#5
KenPom
#5
NET
Illinois logo
Illinois
#5 • +29.8 • B10
THU MAR 26
65 55
final score
Houston
#10 • +28.5neutral
Houston logo
+6.5
Model line
-3.5
Market line
-10.0
Edge · Premium ATS
27%
Win probability
Houston 27%Illinois 73%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
Lehigh logovs Lehigh
W 75–57#226
Nov 8
Towson logovs Towson
W 65–48#221
Nov 13
Oakland logovs Oakland
W 78–45#122
Nov 16
Auburn logoat Auburn
W 73–72#55
Nov 21
Rider logovs Rider
W 91–45#357
Nov 24
Syracuse logovs Syracuse
W 78–74#199
Nov 25
Tennessee logovs Tennessee
L 73–76#17
Nov 26
Notre Dame logovs Notre Dame
W 66–56#201
Dec 6
Florida State logovs Florida State
W 82–67#116
Dec 10
Jackson State logovs Jackson State
W 80–38#356
Dec 13
New Orleans logovs New Orleans
W 99–57#210
Dec 20
Arkansas logoat Arkansas
W 94–85#15
Dec 29
Middle Tennessee State logovs Middle Tennessee State
W 69–60#147
Jan 3
Cincinnati logoat Cincinnati
W 67–60#50
Jan 6
Texas Tech logovs Texas Tech
W 69–65#4376–6862%
Jan 10
Baylor logoat Baylor
W 77–55#8481–6859%
Jan 13
West Virginia logovs West Virginia
W 77–48#10872–5887%
Jan 18
Arizona State logovs Arizona State
W 103–73#10180–6494%
Jan 24
Texas Tech logoat Texas Tech
L 86–90#4375–6935%
Jan 28
TCU logoat TCU
W 79–70#4574–6465%
Jan 31
Cincinnati logovs Cincinnati
W 76–54#5072–6190%
Feb 4
UCF logovs UCF
W 79–55#9281–6682%
Feb 7
Brigham Young logoat Brigham Young
W 77–66#3778–7041%
Feb 10
Utah logoat Utah
W 66–52#24883–6290%
Feb 14
Kansas State logovs Kansas State
W 78–64#23084–6393%
Feb 16
Iowa State logoat Iowa State
L 67–70#969–6934%
Feb 21
Arizona logovs Arizona
L 66–73#270–7362%
Feb 23
Kansas logoat Kansas
L 56–69#1871–6641%
Feb 28
Colorado logovs Colorado
W 102–62#11283–6592%
Mar 4
Baylor logovs Baylor
W 77–64#8482–6785%
Mar 7
Oklahoma State logoat Oklahoma State
W 82–75#9984–6865%
Mar 12
Brigham Young logovs Brigham Young
W 73–66#3778–6961%
Mar 13
Kansas logovs Kansas
W 69–47#1871–6552%
Mar 14
Arizona logovs Arizona
L 74–79#269–7324%
Mar 19
Idaho logovs Idaho
W 78–47#16781–6081%
Mar 21
Texas A&M logovs Texas A&M
W 88–57#4177–6676%
Mar 26
Illinois logovs Illinois
L 55–65#573–7227%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#7#10#13#16#17
#10
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
2
Seed
South
Region
Sweet 16
Finish
The bracket is resolved, so this is the result rather than a probability. It becomes an odds card again when the file carries fractions.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#5
KenPom rank#5
NET rank#5
Quality wins36.5#20
Rebound margin+3.2#52
Turnover margin+4.7#3
Assists per game14.8#90
Three-point margin+0.031#67
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Houston

2025–26 • ATS
00
Picks on Houston
1210
Picks against
+0.9u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 22 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.