Team Pages/B10/UCLA
UCLA logo
B10 • 2025–26 SEASON

UCLA

Record 24-12vs line 8–7 ATSLast L 57–73 at UConnTournament 7 seed, Round of 32
#21
BBMI rank
+26.4
Rating
#28
KenPom
#30
NET
UCLA logo
UCLA
#21 • +26.4 • B10
SUN MAR 22
57 73
final score
UConn
#14 • +27.9neutral
UConn logo
-1.5
Model line
+4.5
Market line
+6.0
Edge · Premium ATS
55%
Win probability
UCLA 55%UConn 45%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
Eastern Washington logovs Eastern Washington
W 80–74#192
Nov 8
Pepperdine logovs Pepperdine
W 74–63#275
Nov 11
West Georgia logovs West Georgia
W 83–62#284
Nov 15
Arizona logovs Arizona
L 65–69#2
Nov 19
Sacramento State logovs Sacramento State
W 79–48#259
Nov 22
Presbyterian logovs Presbyterian
W 86–46#260
Nov 26
California logoat California
L 72–80#68
Dec 3
Washington logoat Washington
W 82–80#71
Dec 6
Oregon logovs Oregon
W 74–63#150
Dec 13
Gonzaga logoat Gonzaga
L 72–82#11
Dec 17
Arizona State logovs Arizona State
W 90–77#101
Dec 19
Cal Poly logovs Cal Poly
W 108–87#243
Dec 23
UC Riverside logovs UC Riverside
W 97–65#314
Jan 3
Iowa logoat Iowa
L 61–74#25
Jan 6
Wisconsin logoat Wisconsin
L 72–80#2677–8070%
Jan 10
Maryland logovs Maryland
W 67–55#28281–6896%
Jan 14
Penn State logoat Penn State
W 71–60#21584–7186%
Jan 17
Ohio State logoat Ohio State
L 74–86#2776–7739%
Jan 20
Purdue logovs Purdue
W 69–67#476–8138%
Jan 24
Northwestern logovs Northwestern
W 71–64#6479–7272%
Jan 28
Oregon logoat Oregon
W 73–57#15078–6973%
Jan 31
Indiana logovs Indiana
L 97–98#4278–7465%
Feb 3
Rutgers logovs Rutgers
W 98–66#20781–6897%
Feb 7
Washington logovs Washington
W 77–73#7178–7276%
Feb 14
Michigan logoat Michigan
L 56–86#169–839%
Feb 17
Michigan State logoat Michigan State
L 59–82#671–7724%
Feb 21
Illinois logovs Illinois
W 95–94#574–8146%
Feb 24
USC logovs USC
W 81–62#8580–7177%
Feb 28
Minnesota logoat Minnesota
L 73–78#7776–7068%
Mar 3
Nebraska logovs Nebraska
W 72–52#771–7448%
Mar 7
USC logoat USC
W 89–68#8579–7157%
Mar 12
Rutgers logovs Rutgers
W 72–59#20780–6888%
Mar 13
Michigan State logovs Michigan State
W 88–84#671–7635%
Mar 14
Purdue logovs Purdue
L 66–73#474–8137%
Mar 20
UCF logovs UCF
W 75–71#9280–7573%
Mar 22
UConn logovs UConn
L 57–73#1469–7555%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#16#20#24#28#32#33
#21
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
7
Seed
East
Region
Round of 32
Finish
The bracket is resolved, so this is the result rather than a probability. It becomes an odds card again when the file carries fractions.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#30
KenPom rank#28
NET rank#30
Quality wins26.5#22
Rebound margin-1.9#234
Turnover margin+3.2#13
Assists per game16.3#29
Three-point margin+0.059#18
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on UCLA

2025–26 • ATS
75
Picks on UCLA
12
Picks against
+0.3u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 15 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.