Team Pages/B12/Arizona
Arizona logo
B12 • 2025–26 SEASON

Arizona

Record 35-2vs line 10–6 ATSLast L 73–91 vs MichiganTournament 1 seed, Final Four
#2
BBMI rank
+33.6
Rating
#2
KenPom
#3
NET
Michigan logo
Michigan
#1 • +33.6 • B10
SAT APR 4
91 73
final score
Arizona
#2 • +33.6neutral
Arizona logo
-3.5
Model line
+1.5
Market line
+5.0
Edge · Tracked ATS
63%
Win probability
Arizona 63%Michigan 37%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
Florida logovs Florida
W 93–87#8
Nov 8
Utah Tech logovs Utah Tech
W 93–67#157
Nov 12
Northern Arizona logovs Northern Arizona
W 84–49#312
Nov 15
UCLA logoat UCLA
W 69–65#21
Nov 20
UConn logoat UConn
W 71–67#14
Nov 25
Denver logovs Denver
W 103–73#246
Nov 29
Norfolk State logovs Norfolk State
W 98–61#302
Dec 6
Auburn logovs Auburn
W 97–68#55
Dec 13
Alabama logoat Alabama
W 96–75#24
Dec 16
Abilene Christian logovs Abilene Christian
W 96–62#295
Dec 20
San Diego State logovs San Diego State
W 68–45#30
Dec 22
Bethune-Cookman logovs Bethune-Cookman
W 107–71#245
Dec 29
South Dakota State logovs South Dakota State
W 99–71#236
Jan 3
Utah logoat Utah
W 97–78#248
Jan 7
Kansas State logovs Kansas State
W 101–76#23090–6596%
Jan 10
TCU logoat TCU
W 86–73#4580–6678%
Jan 14
Arizona State logovs Arizona State
W 89–82#10186–6698%
Jan 17
UCF logoat UCF
W 84–77#9287–6988%
Jan 21
Cincinnati logovs Cincinnati
W 77–51#5078–6396%
Jan 24
West Virginia logovs West Virginia
W 88–53#10878–6095%
Jan 26
Brigham Young logoat Brigham Young
W 86–83#3785–7345%
Jan 31
Arizona State logoat Arizona State
W 87–74#10185–6788%
Feb 7
Oklahoma State logovs Oklahoma State
W 84–47#9992–6996%
Feb 9
Kansas logoat Kansas
L 78–82#1877–6844%
Feb 14
Texas Tech logovs Texas Tech
L 75–78#4382–7084%
Feb 18
Brigham Young logovs Brigham Young
W 75–68#3786–7191%
Feb 21
Houston logoat Houston
W 73–66#1073–7038%
Feb 24
Baylor logoat Baylor
W 87–80#8488–7073%
Feb 28
Kansas logovs Kansas
W 84–61#1878–6786%
Mar 2
Iowa State logovs Iowa State
W 73–57#976–7087%
Mar 7
Colorado logoat Colorado
W 89–79#11288–6985%
Mar 12
UCF logovs UCF
W 81–59#9287–6896%
Mar 13
Iowa State logovs Iowa State
W 82–80#975–7077%
Mar 14
Houston logovs Houston
W 79–74#1073–6976%
Mar 20
L
vs LIU
W 92–58#193
Mar 22
Utah State logovs Utah State
W 78–66#1983–7094%
Mar 26
Arkansas logovs Arkansas
W 109–88#1585–7590%
Mar 28
Purdue logovs Purdue
W 79–64#481–7481%
Apr 4
Michigan logovs Michigan
L 73–91#175–7563%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#1#2#3#4#5#6
#2
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
1
Seed
West
Region
Final Four
Finish
The bracket is resolved, so this is the result rather than a probability. It becomes an odds card again when the file carries fractions.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#3
KenPom rank#2
NET rank#3
Quality wins166.0#2
Rebound margin+10.6#6
Turnover margin+0.8#99
Assists per game15.8#42
Three-point margin+0.059#17
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Arizona

2025–26 • ATS
63
Picks on Arizona
43
Picks against
+3.1u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 16 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.