Team Pages/B12/Brigham Young
Brigham Young logo
B12 • 2025–26 SEASON

Brigham Young

Record 23-12vs line 9–3 ATSLast L 71–79 vs TexasTournament 6 seed, Round of 64
#37
BBMI rank
+24.6
Rating
#24
KenPom
#23
NET
Texas logo
Texas
#74 • +22.8 • SEC
THU MAR 19
79 71
final score
Brigham Young
#37 • +24.6neutral
Brigham Young logo
-2.5
Model line
-2.5
Market line
0.0
Edge
59%
Win probability
Brigham Young 59%Texas 41%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
Villanova logovs Villanova
W 71–66#54
Nov 9
Holy Cross logovs Holy Cross
W 98–53#328
Nov 12
Delaware logovs Delaware
W 85–68#265
Nov 16
UConn logoat UConn
L 84–86#14
Nov 21
Wisconsin logovs Wisconsin
W 98–70#26
Nov 27
Miami (FL) logoat Miami (FL)
W 72–62#31
Nov 29
Dayton logoat Dayton
W 83–79#34
Dec 3
California Baptist logovs California Baptist
W 91–60#139
Dec 9
Clemson logovs Clemson
W 67–64#47
Dec 13
UC Riverside logovs UC Riverside
W 100–53#314
Dec 16
Pacific logovs Pacific
W 93–57#151
Dec 19
Abilene Christian logovs Abilene Christian
W 85–67#295
Dec 22
Eastern Washington logovs Eastern Washington
W 109–81#192
Jan 3
Kansas State logoat Kansas State
W 83–73#230
Jan 7
Arizona State logovs Arizona State
W 104–76#1015%
Jan 10
Utah logoat Utah
W 89–84#24883%
Jan 14
TCU logovs TCU
W 76–70#4578–7488%
Jan 17
Texas Tech logoat Texas Tech
L 71–84#4378–8135%
Jan 24
Utah logovs Utah
W 91–78#24887–7296%
Jan 26
Arizona logovs Arizona
L 83–86#273–8555%
Jan 31
Kansas logoat Kansas
L 82–90#1873–7722%
Feb 4
Oklahoma State logoat Oklahoma State
L 92–99#9987–7955%
Feb 7
Houston logovs Houston
L 66–77#1070–7859%
Feb 10
Baylor logoat Baylor
W 99–94#8484–7944%
Feb 14
Colorado logovs Colorado
W 90–86#11285–7690%
Feb 18
Arizona logoat Arizona
L 68–75#271–869%
Feb 21
Iowa State logovs Iowa State
W 79–69#973–7960%
Feb 24
UCF logovs UCF
L 84–97#9284–7773%
Feb 28
West Virginia logoat West Virginia
L 71–79#10874–6953%
Mar 3
Cincinnati logoat Cincinnati
L 68–90#5073–7348%
Mar 7
Texas Tech logovs Texas Tech
W 82–76#4379–7973%
Mar 10
Kansas State logovs Kansas State
W 105–91#23085–7488%
Mar 11
West Virginia logovs West Virginia
W 68–48#10874–6865%
Mar 12
Houston logovs Houston
L 66–73#1069–7839%
Mar 19
Texas logovs Texas
L 71–79#7481–7959%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#19#26#33#40#46
#37
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
6
Seed
West
Region
Round of 64
Finish
The bracket is resolved, so this is the result rather than a probability. It becomes an odds card again when the file carries fractions.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#23
KenPom rank#24
NET rank#23
Quality wins-3.0#35
Rebound margin+3.0#57
Turnover margin+0.6#115
Assists per game12.6#226
Three-point margin-0.008#231
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Brigham Young

2025–26 • ATS
32
Picks on Brigham Young
61
Picks against
+5.2u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 12 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.