Team Pages/B12/Utah
Utah logo
B12 • 2025–26 SEASON

Utah

Record 10-22vs line 11–1 ATSLast L 66–73 at CincinnatiTournament did not qualify
#248
BBMI rank
+16.2
Rating
#129
KenPom
#132
NET
Utah logo
Utah
#248 • +16.2 • B12
TUE MAR 10
66 73
final score
Cincinnati
#50 • +23.7neutral
Cincinnati logo
+10.5
Model line
+11.5
Market line
+1.0
Edge
12%
Win probability
Utah 12%Cincinnati 88%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
San Jose State logovs San Jose State
W 84–75#297
Nov 9
Weber State logovs Weber State
W 92–89#191
Nov 11
Holy Cross logovs Holy Cross
W 87–69#328
Nov 16
Sam Houston State logovs Sam Houston State
W 85–79#106
Nov 19
Fort Wayne logovs Fort Wayne
W 85–77#228
Nov 21
Cal Poly logovs Cal Poly
L 85–92#243
Nov 26
Grand Canyon logoat Grand Canyon
L 58–68#52
Nov 27
Ole Miss logoat Ole Miss
W 75–74#114
Dec 2
California logoat California
L 72–79#68
Dec 6
California Baptist logovs California Baptist
W 91–85#139
Dec 13
Mississippi State logovs Mississippi State
L 74–82#247
Dec 20
Eastern Washington logovs Eastern Washington
W 101–77#192
Dec 29
Washington logoat Washington
L 65–74#71
Jan 3
Arizona logovs Arizona
L 78–97#2
Jan 7
Colorado logoat Colorado
L 73–85#11275–8327%
Jan 10
Brigham Young logovs Brigham Young
L 84–89#3717%
Jan 14
Texas Tech logoat Texas Tech
L 74–88#4369–865%
Jan 17
TCU logovs TCU
W 82–79#4568–7912%
Jan 20
Kansas State logoat Kansas State
L 78–81#23076–8024%
Jan 24
Brigham Young logoat Brigham Young
L 78–91#3772–874%
Jan 31
Oklahoma State logovs Oklahoma State
L 69–81#9978–8329%
Feb 4
Arizona State logovs Arizona State
L 63–71#10173–8043%
Feb 7
Kansas logoat Kansas
L 59–71#1865–823%
Feb 10
Houston logovs Houston
L 52–66#1062–8310%
Feb 15
Cincinnati logoat Cincinnati
L 65–69#5065–7816%
Feb 18
West Virginia logoat West Virginia
W 61–56#10865–7415%
Feb 21
UCF logovs UCF
L 71–73#9274–8221%
Feb 24
Iowa State logovs Iowa State
L 59–75#964–8410%
Feb 28
Arizona State logoat Arizona State
L 60–73#10172–8118%
Mar 3
Colorado logovs Colorado
L 78–92#11275–8127%
Mar 7
Baylor logoat Baylor
L 75–101#8474–848%
Mar 10
Cincinnati logovs Cincinnati
L 66–73#5065–7612%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#147#175#203#231#258
#248
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
This team is not in the 2025–26 bracket.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#132
KenPom rank#129
NET rank#132
Quality wins-132.5#352
Rebound margin-1.7#226
Turnover margin-2.2#320
Assists per game13.4#174
Three-point margin+0.002#185
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Utah

2025–26 • ATS
71
Picks on Utah
40
Picks against
+9.0u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 12 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.