Team Pages/B12/Cincinnati
Cincinnati logo
B12 • 2025–26 SEASON

Cincinnati

Record 18-15vs line 5–6 ATSLast L 65–66 at UCFTournament did not qualify
#50
BBMI rank
+23.7
Rating
#45
KenPom
#49
NET
Cincinnati logo
Cincinnati
#50 • +23.7 • B12
WED MAR 11
65 66
final score
UCF
#92 • +22.3neutral
UCF logo
-1.5
Model line
-2.5
Market line
-1.0
Edge
57%
Win probability
Cincinnati 57%UCF 43%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
Western Carolina logovs Western Carolina
W 94–63#279
Nov 8
Georgia State logovs Georgia State
W 74–64#299
Nov 12
Dayton logovs Dayton
W 74–62#34
Nov 16
Mount St. Mary's logovs Mount St. Mary's
W 72–55#269
Nov 21
Louisville logovs Louisville
L 64–74#22
Nov 25
NJIT logovs NJIT
W 94–67#337
Nov 27
Eastern Michigan logovs Eastern Michigan
L 56–64#268
Dec 1
Tarleton State logovs Tarleton State
W 76–58#257
Dec 5
Xavier logoat Xavier
L 74–79#177
Dec 13
Georgia logoat Georgia
L 65–84#36
Dec 17
Alabama State logovs Alabama State
W 88–51#333
Dec 21
Clemson logoat Clemson
L 65–68#47
Dec 29
Lipscomb logovs Lipscomb
W 89–62#137
Jan 3
Houston logovs Houston
L 60–67#10
Jan 6
West Virginia logoat West Virginia
L 60–62#10865–6343%
Jan 11
UCF logoat UCF
L 72–73#9274–7126%
Jan 14
Colorado logovs Colorado
W 77–68#11276–6968%
Jan 17
Iowa State logovs Iowa State
W 79–70#965–7231%
Jan 21
Arizona logoat Arizona
L 51–77#263–784%
Jan 24
Arizona State logoat Arizona State
L 68–82#10172–6959%
Jan 28
Baylor logovs Baylor
W 67–57#8476–7163%
Jan 31
Houston logoat Houston
L 54–76#1061–7210%
Feb 5
West Virginia logovs West Virginia
L 54–59#10867–6262%
Feb 8
UCF logovs UCF
W 92–72#9275–7050%
Feb 11
Kansas State logoat Kansas State
W 91–62#23076–6859%
Feb 15
Utah logovs Utah
W 69–65#24878–6584%
Feb 21
Kansas logoat Kansas
W 84–68#1865–7015%
Feb 24
Texas Tech logoat Texas Tech
L 68–80#4369–7313%
Feb 28
Oklahoma State logovs Oklahoma State
W 91–68#9979–7173%
Mar 3
Brigham Young logovs Brigham Young
W 90–68#3773–7352%
Mar 7
TCU logoat TCU
L 63–73#4568–6831%
Mar 10
Utah logovs Utah
W 73–66#24876–6588%
Mar 11
UCF logovs UCF
L 65–66#9274–7057%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#48#62#76#90#104#105
#50
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
This team is not in the 2025–26 bracket.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#49
KenPom rank#45
NET rank#49
Quality wins-46.5#77
Rebound margin+2.3#83
Turnover margin+0.2#136
Assists per game16.0#36
Three-point margin+0.029#73
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Cincinnati

2025–26 • ATS
01
Picks on Cincinnati
55
Picks against
-1.5u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 11 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.