Team Pages/B12/Texas Tech
Texas Tech logo
B12 • 2025–26 SEASON

Texas Tech

Record 23-11vs line 11–4 ATSLast L 65–90 at AlabamaTournament 5 seed, Round of 32
#43
BBMI rank
+24.3
Rating
#20
KenPom
#19
NET
Texas Tech logo
Texas Tech
#43 • +24.3 • B12
SUN MAR 22
65 90
final score
Alabama
#24 • +26.1neutral
Alabama logo
+6.5
Model line
-1.5
Market line
-8.0
Edge · Premium ATS
27%
Win probability
Texas Tech 27%Alabama 73%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 5
Lindenwood logovs Lindenwood
W 98–60#232
Nov 8
Sam Houston State logovs Sam Houston State
W 98–77#106
Nov 12
Illinois logoat Illinois
L 77–81#5
Nov 15
Milwaukee logovs Milwaukee
W 80–63#308
Nov 21
Wake Forest logovs Wake Forest
W 84–83#76
Nov 22
Purdue logoat Purdue
L 56–86#4
Nov 26
New Orleans logovs New Orleans
W 82–50#210
Nov 30
Wyoming logovs Wyoming
W 76–72#156
Dec 7
LSU logovs LSU
W 82–58#104
Dec 13
Arkansas logoat Arkansas
L 86–93#15
Dec 16
Northern Colorado logovs Northern Colorado
W 101–90#111
Dec 20
Duke logoat Duke
W 82–81#3
Dec 28
Winthrop logovs Winthrop
W 87–57#100
Jan 3
Oklahoma State logovs Oklahoma State
W 102–80#99
Jan 6
Houston logoat Houston
L 65–69#1068–7638%
Jan 10
Colorado logoat Colorado
W 73–71#11282–7569%
Jan 14
Utah logovs Utah
W 88–74#24886–6995%
Jan 17
Brigham Young logovs Brigham Young
W 84–71#3781–7865%
Jan 20
Baylor logoat Baylor
W 92–73#8482–7651%
Jan 24
Houston logovs Houston
W 90–86#1069–7565%
Jan 31
UCF logoat UCF
L 80–88#9281–7552%
Feb 2
Kansas logovs Kansas
L 61–64#1873–7260%
Feb 8
West Virginia logoat West Virginia
W 70–63#10872–6763%
Feb 11
Colorado logovs Colorado
W 78–44#11284–7391%
Feb 14
Arizona logoat Arizona
W 78–75#270–8216%
Feb 17
Arizona State logoat Arizona State
L 67–72#10180–7372%
Feb 21
Kansas State logovs Kansas State
W 100–72#23085–7189%
Feb 24
Cincinnati logovs Cincinnati
W 80–68#5073–6987%
Feb 28
Iowa State logoat Iowa State
W 82–73#970–7722%
Mar 3
TCU logovs TCU
L 65–73#4576–7165%
Mar 7
Brigham Young logoat Brigham Young
L 76–82#3779–7927%
Mar 12
Iowa State logovs Iowa State
L 53–75#970–7624%
Mar 20
Akron logovs Akron
W 91–71#6183–7548%
Mar 22
Alabama logovs Alabama
L 65–90#2481–8327%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#14#24#34#44#52
#43
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
5
Seed
Midwest
Region
Round of 32
Finish
The bracket is resolved, so this is the result rather than a probability. It becomes an odds card again when the file carries fractions.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#19
KenPom rank#20
NET rank#19
Quality wins40.5#17
Rebound margin+2.1#92
Turnover margin-0.8#224
Assists per game15.5#48
Three-point margin+0.070#4
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Texas Tech

2025–26 • ATS
40
Picks on Texas Tech
74
Picks against
+6.0u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 15 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.