Team Pages/ACC/Clemson
Clemson logo
ACC • 2025–26 SEASON

Clemson

Record 24-11vs line 8–3 ATSLast L 61–67 vs IowaTournament 8 seed, Round of 64
#47
BBMI rank
+24.1
Rating
#39
KenPom
#34
NET
Iowa logo
Iowa
#25 • +26.1 • B10
FRI MAR 20
67 61
final score
Clemson
#47 • +24.1neutral
Clemson logo
+1.5
Model line
+2.5
Market line
+1.0
Edge
45%
Win probability
Clemson 45%Iowa 55%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
New Hampshire logovs New Hampshire
W 88–38#354
Nov 8
Gardner-Webb logovs Gardner-Webb
W 97–59#364
Nov 12
Morehead State logovs Morehead State
W 83–56#212
Nov 15
Georgetown logoat Georgetown
L 74–79#86
Nov 18
North Alabama logovs North Alabama
W 81–61#340
Nov 21
West Virginia logovs West Virginia
W 70–67#108
Nov 23
Georgia logoat Georgia
W 97–94#36
Nov 29
Alabama A&M logovs Alabama A&M
W 92–56#255
Dec 3
Alabama logoat Alabama
L 84–90#24
Dec 9
Brigham Young logoat Brigham Young
L 64–67#37
Dec 13
Mercer logovs Mercer
W 70–63#149
Dec 16
South Carolina logovs South Carolina
W 68–61#217
Dec 21
Cincinnati logovs Cincinnati
W 68–65#50
Dec 31
Syracuse logoat Syracuse
W 64–61#199
Jan 3
Pittsburgh logoat Pittsburgh
W 73–68#240
Jan 7
SMU logovs SMU
W 74–70#3876–7366%
Jan 10
Notre Dame logoat Notre Dame
W 76–61#20175–6872%
Jan 13
Boston College logovs Boston College
W 74–50#28173–6096%
Jan 17
Miami (FL) logovs Miami (FL)
W 69–59#3171–7274%
Jan 20
NC State logovs NC State
L 76–80#4875–7365%
Jan 24
Georgia Tech logoat Georgia Tech
W 77–63#22477–6476%
Jan 31
Pittsburgh logovs Pittsburgh
W 63–52#24074–6693%
Feb 4
Stanford logoat Stanford
W 66–64#12773–7068%
Feb 7
California logoat California
W 77–55#6873–6957%
Feb 11
Virginia Tech logovs Virginia Tech
L 66–76#5374–6968%
Feb 14
Duke logoat Duke
L 54–67#363–7611%
Feb 18
Wake Forest logoat Wake Forest
L 77–85#7675–7053%
Feb 21
Florida State logovs Florida State
L 65–70#11676–7278%
Feb 28
Louisville logovs Louisville
W 80–75#2271–7449%
Mar 3
North Carolina logoat North Carolina
L 63–67#3271–7324%
Mar 7
Georgia Tech logovs Georgia Tech
W 79–76#22478–6492%
Mar 11
Wake Forest logovs Wake Forest
W 71–62#7675–7065%
Mar 12
North Carolina logovs North Carolina
W 80–79#3271–7243%
Mar 13
Duke logovs Duke
L 61–73#363–7610%
Mar 20
Iowa logovs Iowa
L 61–67#2569–7245%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#26#32#38#44#50
#47
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
8
Seed
South
Region
Round of 64
Finish
The bracket is resolved, so this is the result rather than a probability. It becomes an odds card again when the file carries fractions.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#34
KenPom rank#39
NET rank#34
Quality wins-24.5#47
Rebound margin+0.3#142
Turnover margin+2.0#47
Assists per game12.6#227
Three-point margin+0.017#122
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Clemson

2025–26 • ATS
30
Picks on Clemson
53
Picks against
+4.3u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 11 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.