
ACC • 2025–26 SEASON
Stanford
#127
BBMI rank
+20.9
Rating
#62
KenPom
#61
NET
Last game
Game Picks →Stanford
THU APR 2
77 – 82
final score
West Virginia
+4.5
Model line
-1.5
Market line
-6.0
Edge · Premium ATS
34%
Win probability
Stanford 34%West Virginia 66%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.
Schedule & projections
line and win prob from the board, where it priced the gameDATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 5
vs Portland StateW 89–79#120
Nov 8
vs MontanaW 91–68#138
Nov 13
vs Montana StateW 77–68#133
Nov 19
vs LouisianaW 93–66#345
Nov 22
vs SeattleL 69–77#105
Nov 28
at MinnesotaW 72–68#77
Nov 29
at Saint LouisW 78–77#23
Dec 1
vs PortlandW 94–72#165
Dec 7
vs UNLVL 74–75#176
Dec 13
at San Jose StateW 86–82#297
Dec 17
vs Texas-ArlingtonW 76–60#183
Dec 20
at ColoradoW 77–68#112
Dec 27
vs Cal State NorthridgeW 88–80#146
Dec 30
vs Notre DameL 40–47#201
Jan 2
vs LouisvilleW 80–76#22
Jan 7
at Virginia TechW 69–68#5375–7525%
Jan 10
at VirginiaL 55–70#1669–7910%
Jan 14
vs North CarolinaW 95–90#3273–7738%
Jan 17
vs DukeL 50–80#365–823%
Jan 24
vs CaliforniaL 66–78#6876–7445%
Jan 28
at Miami (FL)L 70–79#3173–7913%
Jan 31
at Florida StateL 80–88#11677–7842%
Feb 4
vs ClemsonL 64–66#4770–7332%
Feb 7
vs Georgia TechW 95–72#22479–6968%
Feb 11
at Boston CollegeW 70–64#28174–6666%
Feb 14
at Wake ForestL 63–68#7677–7640%
Feb 21
at CaliforniaL 66–72#6875–7425%
Feb 25
vs PittsburghW 75–67#24076–7189%
Feb 28
vs SMUW 95–75#3833%
Mar 4
at Notre DameW 86–78#20177–7352%
Mar 7
at NC StateW 85–84#4876–8015%
Mar 10
vs PittsburghL 63–64#24075–7173%
Apr 2
vs West VirginiaL 77–82#10868–6834%
Ranking over time
weekly · place of 365#106#121#136#151#166
#127
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28
14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.
NCAA tournament
Pulse →This team is not in the 2025–26 bracket.
Regular-season wins
not publishedThis sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.
Profile
Strength of schedule#61
KenPom rank#62
NET rank#61
Quality wins-42.0#72
Rebound margin0.0#159
Turnover margin+2.0#50
Assists per game11.7#299
Three-point margin+0.019#116
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.
BBMI picks on Stanford
2025–26 • ATS1–3
Picks on Stanford
4–3
Picks against
-1.5u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 11 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.