Team Pages/ACC/Stanford
Stanford logo
ACC • 2025–26 SEASON

Stanford

Record 20-12vs line 5–6 ATSLast L 77–82 at West VirginiaTournament did not qualify
#127
BBMI rank
+20.9
Rating
#62
KenPom
#61
NET
Stanford logo
Stanford
#127 • +20.9 • ACC
THU APR 2
77 82
final score
West Virginia
#108 • +21.6neutral
West Virginia logo
+4.5
Model line
-1.5
Market line
-6.0
Edge · Premium ATS
34%
Win probability
Stanford 34%West Virginia 66%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 5
Portland State logovs Portland State
W 89–79#120
Nov 8
Montana logovs Montana
W 91–68#138
Nov 13
Montana State logovs Montana State
W 77–68#133
Nov 19
Louisiana logovs Louisiana
W 93–66#345
Nov 22
Seattle logovs Seattle
L 69–77#105
Nov 28
Minnesota logoat Minnesota
W 72–68#77
Nov 29
Saint Louis logoat Saint Louis
W 78–77#23
Dec 1
Portland logovs Portland
W 94–72#165
Dec 7
UNLV logovs UNLV
L 74–75#176
Dec 13
San Jose State logoat San Jose State
W 86–82#297
Dec 17
Texas-Arlington logovs Texas-Arlington
W 76–60#183
Dec 20
Colorado logoat Colorado
W 77–68#112
Dec 27
Cal State Northridge logovs Cal State Northridge
W 88–80#146
Dec 30
Notre Dame logovs Notre Dame
L 40–47#201
Jan 2
Louisville logovs Louisville
W 80–76#22
Jan 7
Virginia Tech logoat Virginia Tech
W 69–68#5375–7525%
Jan 10
Virginia logoat Virginia
L 55–70#1669–7910%
Jan 14
North Carolina logovs North Carolina
W 95–90#3273–7738%
Jan 17
Duke logovs Duke
L 50–80#365–823%
Jan 24
California logovs California
L 66–78#6876–7445%
Jan 28
Miami (FL) logoat Miami (FL)
L 70–79#3173–7913%
Jan 31
Florida State logoat Florida State
L 80–88#11677–7842%
Feb 4
Clemson logovs Clemson
L 64–66#4770–7332%
Feb 7
Georgia Tech logovs Georgia Tech
W 95–72#22479–6968%
Feb 11
Boston College logoat Boston College
W 70–64#28174–6666%
Feb 14
Wake Forest logoat Wake Forest
L 63–68#7677–7640%
Feb 21
California logoat California
L 66–72#6875–7425%
Feb 25
Pittsburgh logovs Pittsburgh
W 75–67#24076–7189%
Feb 28
SMU logovs SMU
W 95–75#3833%
Mar 4
Notre Dame logoat Notre Dame
W 86–78#20177–7352%
Mar 7
NC State logoat NC State
W 85–84#4876–8015%
Mar 10
Pittsburgh logovs Pittsburgh
L 63–64#24075–7173%
Apr 2
West Virginia logovs West Virginia
L 77–82#10868–6834%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#106#121#136#151#166
#127
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
This team is not in the 2025–26 bracket.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#61
KenPom rank#62
NET rank#61
Quality wins-42.0#72
Rebound margin0.0#159
Turnover margin+2.0#50
Assists per game11.7#299
Three-point margin+0.019#116
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Stanford

2025–26 • ATS
13
Picks on Stanford
43
Picks against
-1.5u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 11 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.