NCAA FOOTBALL · GAME PICKS

Week 8 board

Every game the model priced this week, with its line beside the market's. Picks at the premium edge are gated; the board shows every row either way.

56
Games this week
10
Spreads picks
6–4
Picks this week · 0 covering
Tue, Oct 20 – Sat, Oct 24 · lines as of Sat 1:33 PM CTWk 7Wk 8Wk 9Wk 10
MTSU @ FIU
Kickoff: 79°F · Wind 9 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 20, 9:13 AM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
MTSU 1–3FIU 1–1
FINAL
26–23
FIU -18.6
Vegas FIU -10.0
Spreads
FIU -10.0PREMIUM ★
BBMI Loss
+8.6
Game breakdownPremium

Premium members see each game's breakdown before kickoff. Subscribe

MOST @ DEL
Kickoff: 58°F · Wind 7 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 20, 9:13 AM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
MOST 1–0DEL 3–1
FINAL
38–61
DEL -10.2
Vegas DEL -2.5
Spreads
DEL -2.5PREMIUM ★
BBMI Win
+7.7
Game breakdownPremium

Premium members see each game's breakdown before kickoff. Subscribe

USA @ MRSH
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 58°F · Wind 5 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 20, 9:42 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
USA 0–1MRSH 1–1
FINAL
13–20
MRSH +0.4
Vegas MRSH +3.0
No pick
+2.6
Game breakdownPremium

Premium members see each game's breakdown before kickoff. Subscribe

NMSU @ SHSU
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 71°F · Wind 4 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 21, 9:13 AM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
NMSU 3–0SHSU 1–2
FINAL
30–24
SHSU -0.1
Vegas SHSU +2.5
No pick
+2.6
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
New Mexico State64.45.4214.6130.62.41.3
Sam Houston State65.45.4214.4136.82.61.3

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

New Mexico State
Sam Houston State
QBAdam DamanteProjected PPR: 14.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts22.329.029
Completions13.317.719
Passing yds136.7206.0160
Passing TD1.01.32
Interceptions0.70.81
Rushing yds5.315.90
Rushing TD0.30.20
Fumbles lost——0
QBLandyn LockeProjected PPR: 15.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts35.430.831
Completions23.219.118
Passing yds261.2219.7235
Passing TD2.21.41
Interceptions0.60.91
Rushing yds16.218.50
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
RB1James JonesProjected PPR: 12.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.515.027
Rushing yds99.570.3178
Rushing TD0.50.61
Receptions1.31.10
Receiving yds8.38.50
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Landan BrownProjected PPR: 9.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries5.28.43
Rushing yds20.838.5-4
Rushing TD0.20.30
Receptions3.02.21
Receiving yds15.616.1-2
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Myles LibmanProjected PPR: 4.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.02.9—
Receptions1.21.72
Receiving yds16.019.27
Receiving TD0.30.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Chris ReedProjected PPR: 9.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.05.8—
Receptions3.03.51
Receiving yds18.045.24
Receiving TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2TK KingProjected PPR: 11.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.57.4—
Receptions3.34.43
Receiving yds47.753.521
Receiving TD0.50.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Tim Burns Jr.Projected PPR: 7.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets3.64.0—
Receptions1.82.54
Receiving yds41.035.3117
Receiving TD0.40.21
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

JMU @ Appalachian St.
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 52°F · Wind 8 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 22, 9:13 AM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
JMU 2–1Appalachian St. –
FINAL
31–34
JMU -14.7
Vegas JMU -11.5
No pick
+3.2
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
James Madison74.06.4246.2223.91.41.1
Appalachian State68.45.4229.6137.02.41.6

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

James Madison
Appalachian State
QBCamden ColemanProjected PPR: 21.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts25.730.739
Completions16.018.822
Passing yds191.0242.4232
Passing TD1.81.91
Interceptions0.20.71
Rushing yds20.331.611
Rushing TD0.20.41
Fumbles lost——0
QBMalachi SingletonProjected PPR: 15.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.433.140
Completions20.219.626
Passing yds256.6228.9271
Passing TD1.41.32
Interceptions0.41.10
Rushing yds11.225.4-1
Rushing TD0.40.20
Fumbles lost——0
RB1George PettawayProjected PPR: 19.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries16.017.715
Rushing yds106.5102.657
Rushing TD1.01.11
Receptions1.01.32
Receiving yds7.313.013
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jaquari LewisProjected PPR: 9.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries11.411.013
Rushing yds51.848.874
Rushing TD0.80.30
Receptions1.01.51
Receiving yds6.411.16
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Michael ScottProjected PPR: 10.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.75.7—
Receptions3.73.43
Receiving yds52.041.847
Receiving TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Sam Pickett IIIProjected PPR: 14.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.58.3—
Receptions3.04.96
Receiving yds41.567.863
Receiving TD1.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Braeden WisloskiProjected PPR: 9.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.05.2—
Receptions4.33.32
Receiving yds51.040.884
Receiving TD0.00.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jackson GrierProjected PPR: 4.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets1.63.1—
Receptions1.21.90
Receiving yds10.220.60
Receiving TD0.20.10
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

LIB @ KENN
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 65°F · Wind 8 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 22, 9:13 AM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
LIB 3–0KENN 0–2
FINAL
34–6
LIB -11.1
Vegas LIB -9.5
No pick
+1.6
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Liberty63.96.0168.7213.91.51.0
Kennesaw State61.35.3199.0126.51.31.3

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Liberty
Kennesaw State
QBDeshawn PurdieProjected PPR: 14.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts19.221.719
Completions11.713.010
Passing yds175.2165.5176
Passing TD1.31.11
Interceptions0.00.60
Rushing yds27.327.820
Rushing TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
QBRickie CollinsProjected PPR: 15.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts30.428.926
Completions20.617.415
Passing yds208.4200.6124
Passing TD0.61.10
Interceptions0.60.92
Rushing yds53.038.524
Rushing TD0.80.20
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Kam DavisProjected PPR: 14.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.213.89
Rushing yds107.879.759
Rushing TD0.80.81
Receptions0.80.70
Receiving yds2.26.20
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Boogie Woods IIIProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.010.7—
Rushing yds75.044.3—
Rushing TD1.50.3—
Receptions4.02.5—
Receiving yds17.514.5—
Fumbles lost———
WR1Makai JacksonProjected PPR: 10.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.25.9—
Receptions3.73.51
Receiving yds85.855.325
Receiving TD0.80.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Dylan GaryProjected PPR: 6.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.03.9—
Receptions7.02.35
Receiving yds52.026.843
Receiving TD1.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jamari PersonProjected PPR: 6.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets3.33.6—
Receptions2.02.24
Receiving yds30.327.772
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Brayden MunroeProjected PPR: 8.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.55.0—
Receptions6.03.13
Receiving yds96.543.353
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

ECU @ MEM
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 73°F · Wind 6 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 22, 9:13 AM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
ECU –MEM 2–1
FINAL
34–41
MEM -15.4
Vegas MEM -10.5
No pick
+4.9
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
East Carolina68.35.4221.3149.02.31.3
Memphis74.26.3248.4220.42.41.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

East Carolina
Memphis
QBEmory WilliamsProjected PPR: 14.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts33.030.313
Completions21.518.65
Passing yds238.5217.861
Passing TD2.51.30
Interceptions0.50.90
Rushing yds23.015.619
Rushing TD0.50.10
Fumbles lost——0
QBMarcus StokesProjected PPR: 21.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts24.230.043
Completions16.819.129
Passing yds255.8246.8320
Passing TD2.71.93
Interceptions0.50.70
Rushing yds42.737.031
Rushing TD0.00.32
Fumbles lost——0
RB1TJ Engleman Jr.Projected PPR: 11.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.312.718
Rushing yds121.360.392
Rushing TD1.00.41
Receptions1.31.51
Receiving yds14.315.43
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jaylin CarterProjected PPR: 15.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.714.116
Rushing yds107.283.253
Rushing TD1.30.80
Receptions0.70.93
Receiving yds9.310.830
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Landon SidesProjected PPR: 6.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.53.7—
Receptions1.52.47
Receiving yds13.026.0130
Receiving TD0.00.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Stonka BurnsideProjected PPR: 8.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.04.6—
Receptions3.52.9—
Receiving yds48.537.4—
Receiving TD0.50.3—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Jeremiah MelvinProjected PPR: 10.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.06.5—
Receptions4.03.9—
Receiving yds55.751.7—
Receiving TD0.30.3—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Jemyri DavisProjected PPR: 5.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.03.0—
Receptions3.01.97
Receiving yds45.026.791
Receiving TD0.00.22
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

MASS @ CONN
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 46°F · Wind 6 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 23, 5:17 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
MASS 0–1–1CONN –
FINAL
16–35
MASS +11.1
Vegas MASS +12.5
No pick
+1.4
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Massachusetts64.85.3192.2153.62.21.1
Connecticut66.56.1218.3188.52.11.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Massachusetts
Connecticut
QBAedan McCarthyProjected PPR: 16.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts29.025.1—
Completions15.015.2—
Passing yds171.0179.5—
Passing TD0.01.0—
Interceptions0.00.6—
Rushing yds12.037.5—
Rushing TD0.00.4—
Fumbles lost———
QBKalieb OsborneProjected PPR: 21.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.728.819
Completions16.317.114
Passing yds236.3220.9173
Passing TD1.71.62
Interceptions0.30.70
Rushing yds58.548.266
Rushing TD1.00.51
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Elijah FaulknerProjected PPR: 8.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.710.76
Rushing yds65.348.315
Rushing TD0.00.40
Receptions1.30.72
Receiving yds12.77.09
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Cyncir BowersProjected PPR: 15.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.714.115
Rushing yds96.373.8131
Rushing TD1.30.81
Receptions1.31.61
Receiving yds12.316.95
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jabari LewisProjected PPR: 10.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.56.5—
Receptions4.53.92
Receiving yds70.052.310
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Shamar PorterProjected PPR: 7.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.34.2—
Receptions2.32.53
Receiving yds57.736.930
Receiving TD0.70.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR2T.Y. HardingProjected PPR: 12.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.87.8—
Receptions5.44.8—
Receiving yds55.655.3—
Receiving TD0.20.3—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Ryder TreadwayProjected PPR: 6.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.03.7—
Receptions3.02.21
Receiving yds29.028.62
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

DUKE @ UVA
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 53°F · Wind 6 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 23, 5:17 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
DUKE 2–2UVA 1–2
FINAL
19–16
DUKE +2.0
Vegas DUKE +2.5
No pick
+0.5
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Duke62.05.4198.8137.61.61.1
Virginia64.15.8216.4154.91.81.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Duke
Virginia
QBWalker EgetProjected PPR: 11.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.227.125
Completions16.816.114
Passing yds196.0193.0211
Passing TD1.41.20
Interceptions0.20.71
Rushing yds2.46.10
Rushing TD0.00.00
Fumbles lost——0
QBBeau PribulaProjected PPR: 17.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts23.326.724
Completions15.217.415
Passing yds179.0210.5158
Passing TD2.21.40
Interceptions0.20.61
Rushing yds37.831.566
Rushing TD0.20.20
Fumbles lost——1
RB1Nate SheppardProjected PPR: 13.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries23.816.715
Rushing yds146.875.255
Rushing TD1.60.51
Receptions3.41.82
Receiving yds32.214.611
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jekail MiddlebrookProjected PPR: 12.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.813.624
Rushing yds74.862.4117
Rushing TD0.80.61
Receptions1.01.62
Receiving yds6.214.78
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jonah BurtonProjected PPR: 7.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.04.8—
Receptions5.03.04
Receiving yds63.035.959
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Da'Shawn MartinProjected PPR: 9.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.04.8—
Receptions3.03.22
Receiving yds38.541.122
Receiving TD1.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jared RichardsonProjected PPR: 5.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.03.6—
Receptions3.02.14
Receiving yds44.022.747
Receiving TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Kameron CourtneyProjected PPR: 7.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.04.2—
Receptions3.52.7—
Receiving yds28.833.6—
Receiving TD0.00.2—
Fumbles lost———
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

ARMY @ TLSA
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 68°F · Wind 7 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 23, 5:17 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
ARMY 0–1TLSA 2–1
FINAL
38–35
TLSA -2.6
Vegas TLSA -1.5
No pick
+1.1
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Army59.55.176.6226.70.80.7
Tulsa63.26.3217.6180.60.80.9

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Army
Tulsa
QBCale HellumsProjected PPR: 15.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts10.010.912
Completions5.76.47
Passing yds56.576.864
Passing TD0.50.40
Interceptions0.20.30
Rushing yds121.282.5121
Rushing TD2.20.63
Fumbles lost——0
QBBaylor HayesProjected PPR: 19.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.425.934
Completions19.616.423
Passing yds215.6211.3262
Passing TD1.61.52
Interceptions0.20.61
Rushing yds20.234.0-3
Rushing TD0.40.40
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Stroman BridgesProjected PPR: 5.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries0.56.41
Rushing yds2.028.24
Rushing TD0.00.30
Receptions0.30.40
Receiving yds1.23.90
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Damari AlstonProjected PPR: 14.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.013.711
Rushing yds50.771.259
Rushing TD0.80.70
Receptions2.51.60
Receiving yds18.318.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Zach MundellProjected PPR: 3.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.52.3—
Receptions2.01.41
Receiving yds21.516.90
Receiving TD0.50.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Javon RossProjected PPR: 7.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.04.1—
Receptions3.32.65
Receiving yds34.733.784
Receiving TD0.30.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Oran Singleton Jr.Projected PPR: 13.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.67.6—
Receptions6.64.95
Receiving yds81.065.661
Receiving TD0.60.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

AF @ WYO
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 48°F · Wind 6 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 23, 5:17 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
AF 3–0WYO 3–0
FINAL
14–28
WYO +3.9
Vegas WYO +6.0
No pick
+2.1
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Air Force59.25.275.1232.50.90.7
Wyoming61.05.8191.4160.11.01.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Air Force
Wyoming
QBEvan MeddersProjected PPR: 14.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts3.010.04
Completions2.06.13
Passing yds18.073.827
Passing TD0.00.61
Interceptions0.00.30
Rushing yds151.068.0115
Rushing TD3.00.50
Fumbles lost——1
QBTyler HughesProjected PPR: 19.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts22.324.117
Completions14.015.010
Passing yds145.4186.5113
Passing TD0.41.32
Interceptions1.00.70
Rushing yds79.953.0146
Rushing TD0.70.41
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Matt LongProjected PPR: 4.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries2.74.30
Rushing yds22.321.70
Rushing TD0.00.10
Receptions0.80.62
Receiving yds13.37.130
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Markell HolmanProjected PPR: 10.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.511.69
Rushing yds71.849.635
Rushing TD0.50.41
Receptions2.21.52
Receiving yds14.014.311
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Adam HrynciwProjected PPR: 3.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.52.0—
Receptions1.01.21
Receiving yds21.013.76
Receiving TD0.50.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Eric RichardsonProjected PPR: 7.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.04.1—
Receptions3.52.62
Receiving yds45.034.29
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jonah DawsonProjected PPR: 3.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.52.2—
Receptions1.51.4—
Receiving yds19.516.0—
Receiving TD0.00.1—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Charlie CoenenProjected PPR: 6.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.03.8—
Receptions2.32.32
Receiving yds22.029.333
Receiving TD0.30.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

NCSU @ STAN
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 60°F · Wind 6 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 23, 5:17 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
NCSU 1–0STAN 1–0
FINAL
28–31
STAN +5.5
Vegas STAN +7.5
No pick
+2.0
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
NC State68.16.5264.3177.21.51.2
Stanford67.26.2257.6159.91.81.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

NC State
Stanford
QBCJ BaileyProjected PPR: 21.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.731.730
Completions21.020.717
Passing yds251.2260.3256
Passing TD1.51.92
Interceptions0.70.80
Rushing yds27.529.359
Rushing TD0.30.40
Fumbles lost——0
QBDavis WarrenProjected PPR: 18.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts32.832.037
Completions19.020.522
Passing yds225.2256.7303
Passing TD1.01.84
Interceptions0.30.80
Rushing yds8.515.46
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Davion GauseProjected PPR: 17.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries21.014.415
Rushing yds69.072.149
Rushing TD0.00.80
Receptions3.02.45
Receiving yds45.026.451
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Micah FordProjected PPR: 16.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.816.422
Rushing yds58.381.5150
Rushing TD0.70.80
Receptions2.01.73
Receiving yds11.017.058
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Keenan JacksonProjected PPR: 13.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.76.6—
Receptions5.04.43
Receiving yds77.062.756
Receiving TD1.00.41
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Nico BrownProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.75.7—
Receptions3.73.74
Receiving yds52.047.443
Receiving TD0.30.32
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Victor SnowProjected PPR: 6.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.83.6—
Receptions1.82.34
Receiving yds15.827.432
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jordan OnovugheProjected PPR: 5.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.73.4—
Receptions2.02.1—
Receiving yds18.824.8—
Receiving TD0.00.2—
Fumbles lost———
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

WVU @ TCU
Kickoff: 75°F · Wind 5 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
WVU 1–2TCU 1–1
FINAL
24–20
TCU -19.7
Vegas TCU -10.5
Spreads
TCU -10.5PREMIUM ★
BBMI Loss
+9.2
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
West Virginia63.04.9136.1169.62.31.0
TCU73.06.9290.5216.32.21.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

West Virginia
TCU
QBMichael Hawkins Jr.Projected PPR: 15.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts20.621.215
Completions11.912.57
Passing yds217.0144.379
Passing TD1.40.81
Interceptions0.10.61
Rushing yds116.157.587
Rushing TD2.00.42
Fumbles lost——0
QBJaden CraigProjected PPR: 25.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts32.332.247
Completions21.521.733
Passing yds281.8292.6372
Passing TD1.72.31
Interceptions0.80.71
Rushing yds16.731.226
Rushing TD0.00.41
Fumbles lost——2
RB1Cam CookProjected PPR: 12.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries25.517.018
Rushing yds132.273.790
Rushing TD1.20.50
Receptions1.31.21
Receiving yds10.28.513
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Landon WalkerProjected PPR: 14.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries3.311.3—
Rushing yds22.366.7—
Rushing TD0.00.8—
Receptions0.31.2—
Receiving yds3.315.9—
Fumbles lost———
WR1Prince StrachanProjected PPR: 6.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.03.9—
Receptions5.02.32
Receiving yds121.030.224
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Ed SmallProjected PPR: 16.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.58.2—
Receptions6.85.63
Receiving yds88.077.220
Receiving TD0.50.60
Fumbles lost——0
WR2DJ EppsProjected PPR: 8.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.75.4—
Receptions3.73.3—
Receiving yds92.741.7—
Receiving TD0.80.2—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Jordan DwyerProjected PPR: 13.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.06.4—
Receptions5.54.310
Receiving yds125.071.3113
Receiving TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

WMU @ TOL
Kickoff: 55°F · Wind 1 mph · Fog

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
WMU 2–0TOL 2–2
FINAL
38–45
TOL -9.8
Vegas TOL -2.5
Spreads
TOL -2.5PREMIUM ★
BBMI Win
+7.3
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Western Michigan61.14.7150.9136.12.61.1
Toledo68.65.9227.6176.11.71.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Western Michigan
Toledo
QBBroc LowryProjected PPR: 13.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts21.123.729
Completions14.314.112
Passing yds149.7157.1207
Passing TD1.10.82
Interceptions0.10.72
Rushing yds42.938.317
Rushing TD0.40.31
Fumbles lost——1
QBJohn Alan RichterProjected PPR: 16.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.129.441
Completions20.618.529
Passing yds264.7228.1391
Passing TD2.01.63
Interceptions0.10.61
Rushing yds2.310.8-5
Rushing TD0.00.11
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jalen BuckleyProjected PPR: 10.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.714.318
Rushing yds71.361.292
Rushing TD1.00.41
Receptions1.51.10
Receiving yds15.510.00
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Autavius IsonProjected PPR: 15.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries18.015.77
Rushing yds104.078.727
Rushing TD1.00.81
Receptions0.01.51
Receiving yds0.015.113
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Baylin BrooksProjected PPR: 5.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.03.9—
Receptions4.02.23
Receiving yds26.023.157
Receiving TD0.00.11
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Adjatay DabbsProjected PPR: 12.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.87.0—
Receptions5.44.38
Receiving yds74.258.5124
Receiving TD0.80.42
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Aveion ChenaultProjected PPR: 9.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.85.7—
Receptions3.73.56
Receiving yds54.343.2105
Receiving TD0.20.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Daryl Barnett Jr.Projected PPR: 5.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.03.2—
Receptions3.01.94
Receiving yds34.024.741
Receiving TD1.00.11
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

CAL @ SMU
Kickoff: 74°F · Wind 5 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
CAL 2–1SMU 1–0
FINAL
20–59
SMU -29.4
Vegas SMU -18.5
Spreads
SMU -18.5PREMIUM
BBMI Win
+10.9
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
California65.95.2252.091.72.81.3
SMU73.77.0314.4201.61.21.2

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

California
SMU
QBJackson BrousseauProjected PPR: 14.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts34.731.7—
Completions21.720.3—
Passing yds202.7226.4—
Passing TD1.01.3—
Interceptions0.00.9—
Rushing yds14.011.7—
Rushing TD0.00.1—
Fumbles lost———
QBKevin JenningsProjected PPR: 27.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts32.035.923
Completions23.323.916
Passing yds306.7308.7223
Passing TD2.72.63
Interceptions0.80.70
Rushing yds26.734.226
Rushing TD0.30.40
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Ashten EmoryProjected PPR: 11.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.314.314
Rushing yds50.048.927
Rushing TD1.00.40
Receptions3.02.42
Receiving yds14.018.816
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Kendrick RaphaelProjected PPR: 22.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries20.818.722
Rushing yds114.2114.5104
Rushing TD1.21.42
Receptions1.81.61
Receiving yds9.514.622
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Chase HendricksProjected PPR: 12.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.08.0—
Receptions7.45.27
Receiving yds62.452.383
Receiving TD0.20.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Yannick SmithProjected PPR: 15.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.56.7—
Receptions5.04.63
Receiving yds58.567.624
Receiving TD0.00.60
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Trevor RogersProjected PPR: 5.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets1.53.2—
Receptions0.52.1—
Receiving yds2.024.4—
Receiving TD0.00.1—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Jalen CooperProjected PPR: 12.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.06.5—
Receptions6.54.32
Receiving yds85.062.037
Receiving TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

RUTG @ NU
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 60°F · Wind 6 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
RUTG 1–0NU 0–1
FINAL
14–42
NU -21.0
Vegas NU -15.5
No pick
+5.5
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Rutgers62.35.6206.4140.32.41.3
Northwestern66.97.0221.1249.41.00.9

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Rutgers
Northwestern
QBDylan LonerganProjected PPR: 13.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts25.626.90
Completions14.816.40
Passing yds213.2199.10
Passing TD2.01.10
Interceptions1.20.80
Rushing yds12.217.25
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
QBAidan ChilesProjected PPR: 24.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts23.525.325
Completions16.315.719
Passing yds232.0219.1219
Passing TD1.51.93
Interceptions0.00.51
Rushing yds35.347.583
Rushing TD1.20.82
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Antwan RaymondProjected PPR: 13.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries19.514.418
Rushing yds109.568.9150
Rushing TD1.00.61
Receptions1.81.42
Receiving yds16.212.827
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Caleb KomolafeProjected PPR: 19.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.815.513
Rushing yds86.896.2150
Rushing TD1.01.21
Receptions1.81.20
Receiving yds25.513.90
Fumbles lost——0
WR1KJ DuffProjected PPR: 18.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets11.811.1—
Receptions7.06.93
Receiving yds123.589.733
Receiving TD1.50.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Griffin WildeProjected PPR: 13.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.57.0—
Receptions6.24.39
Receiving yds85.563.3133
Receiving TD0.80.51
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Dyzier CarterProjected PPR: 5.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.03.5—
Receptions6.02.2—
Receiving yds88.025.9—
Receiving TD0.00.1—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Hayden Eligon IIProjected PPR: 6.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.03.4—
Receptions1.22.21
Receiving yds17.826.78
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

PITT @ MIA
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 80°F · Wind 16 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
PITT 0–2MIA 0–1
FINAL
23–52
MIA -24.8
Vegas MIA -20.5
No pick
+4.3
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Pittsburgh60.24.6185.593.92.91.3
Miami (FL)68.86.9283.3191.91.21.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Pittsburgh
Miami (FL)
QBCorey DaileyProjected PPR: 10.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts25.027.53
Completions11.015.93
Passing yds193.0177.766
Passing TD1.00.91
Interceptions2.00.80
Rushing yds12.011.40
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
QBDarian MensahProjected PPR: 21.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.830.937
Completions22.520.831
Passing yds294.7271.8387
Passing TD3.02.34
Interceptions0.20.70
Rushing yds17.315.3-12
Rushing TD0.30.20
Fumbles lost——0
RB1La'Vell WrightProjected PPR: 7.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.09.84
Rushing yds81.037.311
Rushing TD1.00.20
Receptions1.01.22
Receiving yds5.011.46
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Mark Fletcher Jr.Projected PPR: 15.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.213.613
Rushing yds66.072.741
Rushing TD1.01.01
Receptions1.01.21
Receiving yds6.513.016
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Censere LeeProjected PPR: 5.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.54.1—
Receptions3.02.41
Receiving yds22.022.72
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Malachi ToneyProjected PPR: 21.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.510.1—
Receptions8.36.916
Receiving yds126.398.1194
Receiving TD1.30.83
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Cataurus HicksProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.26.5—
Receptions4.43.85
Receiving yds85.852.2149
Receiving TD0.40.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Daylyn UpshawProjected PPR: 8.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.04.2—
Receptions4.02.82
Receiving yds91.037.431
Receiving TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

RICE @ FAU
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 81°F · Wind 17 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
RICE 1–0FAU –
FINAL
49–51
FAU -12.4
Vegas FAU -8.5
No pick
+3.9
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Rice62.34.892.8207.41.71.0
Florida Atlantic71.86.7303.0177.21.31.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Rice
Florida Atlantic
QBJacurri BrownProjected PPR: 15.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts12.014.2—
Completions5.78.0—
Passing yds68.394.5—
Passing TD0.40.5—
Interceptions0.30.4—
Rushing yds107.975.9—
Rushing TD0.90.4—
Fumbles lost———
QBCaden VeltkampProjected PPR: 22.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts37.233.437
Completions26.822.729
Passing yds290.5286.1339
Passing TD2.52.33
Interceptions0.50.71
Rushing yds2.218.05
Rushing TD0.20.31
Fumbles lost——0
RB1D'Andre Hardeman Jr.Projected PPR: 8.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries9.112.910
Rushing yds33.653.719
Rushing TD0.10.31
Receptions0.00.40
Receiving yds0.05.20
Fumbles lost——1
RB1Ethan ErvinProjected PPR: 12.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.412.36
Rushing yds67.665.57
Rushing TD0.40.70
Receptions1.20.81
Receiving yds6.67.410
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Payton MatthewsProjected PPR: 2.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.01.6—
Receptions1.00.9—
Receiving yds6.011.3—
Receiving TD0.00.1—
Fumbles lost———
WR1Easton MesserProjected PPR: 18.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets12.09.5—
Receptions10.06.512
Receiving yds122.084.6162
Receiving TD1.00.62
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Braylen WalkerProjected PPR: 3.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.52.5—
Receptions1.01.31
Receiving yds8.013.871
Receiving TD0.00.11
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Dominique HenryProjected PPR: 11.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.05.7—
Receptions9.04.00
Receiving yds121.052.60
Receiving TD2.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

LSU @ AUB
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 66°F · Wind 9 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
LSU 0–1AUB 1–1
FINAL
38–17
LSU -10.2
Vegas LSU -7.0
No pick
+3.2
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
LSU74.85.7256.0171.43.11.2
Auburn69.94.7202.1124.44.61.2

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

LSU
Auburn
QBSam LeavittProjected PPR: 21.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts29.932.545
Completions20.920.832
Passing yds253.0253.1387
Passing TD2.01.93
Interceptions1.10.70
Rushing yds47.736.954
Rushing TD1.00.21
Fumbles lost——0
QBByrum BrownProjected PPR: 18.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts30.832.124
Completions19.819.915
Passing yds200.8221.9160
Passing TD1.31.10
Interceptions1.20.90
Rushing yds88.248.721
Rushing TD0.80.41
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Dilin JonesProjected PPR: 17.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries18.416.321
Rushing yds82.177.092
Rushing TD0.70.81
Receptions3.62.94
Receiving yds26.025.027
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jeremiah CobbProjected PPR: 7.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries9.79.75
Rushing yds49.336.314
Rushing TD0.30.30
Receptions1.51.11
Receiving yds7.89.68
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Winston Watkins Jr.Projected PPR: 12.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.76.5—
Receptions6.04.44
Receiving yds71.751.540
Receiving TD0.30.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Keshaun SingletonProjected PPR: 14.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.59.3—
Receptions5.55.64
Receiving yds55.865.764
Receiving TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jackson HarrisProjected PPR: 12.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.06.6—
Receptions4.84.29
Receiving yds76.856.8178
Receiving TD1.20.42
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Chas NimrodProjected PPR: 13.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.28.3—
Receptions5.45.32
Receiving yds58.460.37
Receiving TD0.60.30
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

TTU @ CIN
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 62°F · Wind 3 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
TTU 2–0CIN 0–2
FINAL
24–37
TTU -13.0
Vegas TTU -11.5
No pick
+1.5
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Texas Tech71.46.6270.9202.52.11.1
Cincinnati68.45.9242.1163.12.01.2

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Texas Tech
Cincinnati
QBWill HammondProjected PPR: 21.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts28.031.737
Completions19.220.424
Passing yds219.3269.2227
Passing TD1.02.00
Interceptions0.80.81
Rushing yds21.225.623
Rushing TD0.30.30
Fumbles lost——1
QBJC French IVProjected PPR: 20.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts25.530.430
Completions18.019.519
Passing yds222.7242.6172
Passing TD1.51.64
Interceptions0.00.72
Rushing yds48.237.146
Rushing TD1.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Quinten JoynerProjected PPR: 12.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries7.210.412
Rushing yds29.257.069
Rushing TD0.30.61
Receptions0.21.41
Receiving yds2.320.724
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Cole TabbProjected PPR: 14.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries16.014.216
Rushing yds124.069.1173
Rushing TD2.00.61
Receptions4.02.02
Receiving yds51.023.55
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Coy EakinProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.05.8—
Receptions6.03.74
Receiving yds79.046.945
Receiving TD1.00.30
Fumbles lost——1
WR1JV GibsonProjected PPR: 13.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.57.4—
Receptions4.54.84
Receiving yds68.559.643
Receiving TD0.80.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Kenny JohnsonProjected PPR: 16.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.08.0—
Receptions4.05.17
Receiving yds69.783.181
Receiving TD0.20.50
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Malachi HenryProjected PPR: 6.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets1.83.1—
Receptions1.32.01
Receiving yds44.335.15
Receiving TD0.20.21
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

IU @ MICH
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 58°F · Wind 4 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
IU –MICH 1–0
FINAL
13–6
IU -7.9
Vegas IU -7.5
No pick
+0.4
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Indiana65.55.6202.9164.52.10.8
Michigan61.54.9175.4127.02.31.3

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Indiana
Michigan
QBJosh HooverProjected PPR: 14.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts24.127.118
Completions15.416.88
Passing yds237.3205.981
Passing TD2.61.30
Interceptions0.00.61
Rushing yds14.714.57
Rushing TD0.10.21
Fumbles lost——0
QBTommy CarrProjected PPR: 11.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts4.523.432
Completions3.514.120
Passing yds35.0161.1167
Passing TD0.50.90
Interceptions0.00.71
Rushing yds26.022.26
Rushing TD0.50.10
Fumbles lost——1
RB1Turbo RichardProjected PPR: 13.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.515.219
Rushing yds52.077.068
Rushing TD1.50.70
Receptions1.01.01
Receiving yds20.07.70
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jordan MarshallProjected PPR: 7.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries11.511.512
Rushing yds49.843.626
Rushing TD0.80.30
Receptions0.80.81
Receiving yds8.27.9-1
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Charlie BeckerProjected PPR: 18.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets10.89.7—
Receptions7.06.23
Receiving yds108.584.932
Receiving TD1.00.60
Fumbles lost——0
WR1JJ BuchananProjected PPR: 13.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.58.3—
Receptions3.85.06
Receiving yds65.067.457
Receiving TD0.20.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Nick MarshProjected PPR: 13.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.57.6—
Receptions5.04.72
Receiving yds94.861.425
Receiving TD1.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Andrew MarshProjected PPR: 13.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.39.0—
Receptions4.75.44
Receiving yds48.254.720
Receiving TD0.20.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

M-OH @ CMU
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 60°F · Wind 5 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
M-OH 1–2CMU 4–0
FINAL
28–27
M-OH -6.6
Vegas M-OH -3.5
No pick
+3.1
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Miami (OH)61.45.4172.5156.52.51.0
Central Michigan60.15.1151.5154.01.91.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Miami (OH)
Central Michigan
QBCaleb HeavnerProjected PPR: 14.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts20.324.033
Completions10.314.218
Passing yds119.3173.9221
Passing TD0.71.01
Interceptions0.30.62
Rushing yds63.038.758
Rushing TD0.30.21
Fumbles lost——0
QBAngel FloresProjected PPR: 17.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts15.820.3—
Completions9.212.6—
Passing yds88.2148.7—
Passing TD0.40.9—
Interceptions0.20.6—
Rushing yds124.263.3—
Rushing TD0.80.5—
Fumbles lost———
RB1Rodney NelsonProjected PPR: 11.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.013.510
Rushing yds73.265.443
Rushing TD0.50.61
Receptions0.50.60
Receiving yds5.55.60
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Brock TownsendProjected PPR: 6.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries2.06.81
Rushing yds11.428.51
Rushing TD0.30.20
Receptions1.11.40
Receiving yds9.113.60
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Braylon IsomProjected PPR: 6.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.03.9—
Receptions2.02.3—
Receiving yds9.025.0—
Receiving TD0.00.2—
Fumbles lost———
WR1Langston LewisProjected PPR: 8.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.04.7—
Receptions3.32.810
Receiving yds38.339.7163
Receiving TD0.00.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Lynel Billups-WilliamsProjected PPR: 7.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.84.9—
Receptions3.82.82
Receiving yds47.633.83
Receiving TD0.40.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Justin Ruffin Jr.Projected PPR: 5.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.73.5—
Receptions2.72.22
Receiving yds13.022.711
Receiving TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

BAY @ KU
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 71°F · Wind 11 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
BAY –KU 1–0
FINAL
24–25
KU -1.2
Vegas KU +1.5
No pick
+2.7
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Baylor70.35.5226.0163.91.91.2
Kansas72.05.4192.7197.51.51.4

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Baylor
Kansas
QBDJ LagwayProjected PPR: 15.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts46.833.431
Completions23.219.120
Passing yds278.8227.7236
Passing TD2.01.41
Interceptions0.80.81
Rushing yds6.513.347
Rushing TD0.20.10
Fumbles lost——0
QBIsaiah MarshallProjected PPR: 19.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.829.129
Completions14.715.417
Passing yds215.7194.6212
Passing TD1.51.22
Interceptions0.80.92
Rushing yds68.561.331
Rushing TD0.20.51
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Dawson PendergrassProjected PPR: 10.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries18.212.34
Rushing yds72.058.04
Rushing TD0.20.51
Receptions1.20.80
Receiving yds7.26.60
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Dylan EdwardsProjected PPR: 14.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.816.530
Rushing yds76.279.9156
Rushing TD1.00.60
Receptions2.51.33
Receiving yds25.812.515
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Gavin FreemanProjected PPR: 13.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets12.29.4—
Receptions8.45.39
Receiving yds88.059.7123
Receiving TD0.40.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Nik McMillanProjected PPR: 9.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.76.2—
Receptions4.03.42
Receiving yds75.342.766
Receiving TD0.70.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Louis Brown IVProjected PPR: 11.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.46.5—
Receptions3.83.72
Receiving yds61.254.518
Receiving TD0.60.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Cam PickettProjected PPR: 11.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.78.3—
Receptions5.04.64
Receiving yds62.348.617
Receiving TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

AKR @ KENT
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 60°F · Wind 3 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
AKR 2–1KENT –
FINAL
20–35
KENT -4.9
Vegas KENT -3.0
No pick
+1.9
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Akron64.35.1192.5136.02.51.2
Kent State63.95.5173.7174.71.21.2

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Akron
Kent State
QBBrayden RoggowProjected PPR: 14.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts29.029.034
Completions16.217.220
Passing yds193.6197.5275
Passing TD1.01.20
Interceptions1.60.81
Rushing yds16.218.6-42
Rushing TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
QBDru DeShieldsProjected PPR: 15.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts26.925.433
Completions15.013.318
Passing yds164.0168.4294
Passing TD0.61.14
Interceptions0.90.70
Rushing yds38.438.628
Rushing TD0.40.31
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jordan GantProjected PPR: 12.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.215.828
Rushing yds73.866.3162
Rushing TD0.70.52
Receptions2.21.43
Receiving yds19.310.818
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Brandon WhiteProjected PPR: 9.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries9.511.611
Rushing yds34.555.844
Rushing TD0.00.40
Receptions2.51.12
Receiving yds4.58.567
Fumbles lost——1
WR1Marcel WilliamsProjected PPR: 10.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.07.3—
Receptions5.24.23
Receiving yds61.246.643
Receiving TD0.80.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Wayne HarrisProjected PPR: 10.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.06.7—
Receptions5.33.69
Receiving yds73.351.3156
Receiving TD0.00.33
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Kyan MasonProjected PPR: 8.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.55.5—
Receptions2.83.37
Receiving yds36.238.6129
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Da'Realyst ClarkProjected PPR: 7.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.84.9—
Receptions5.22.51
Receiving yds59.531.85
Receiving TD0.20.30
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

ORE @ ILL
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 69°F · Wind 5 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
ORE 0–1ILL 0–1
FINAL
10–21
ORE -14.1
Vegas ORE -10.5
No pick
+3.6
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Oregon69.76.2246.7188.11.01.1
Illinois67.55.7239.2144.12.11.3

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Oregon
Illinois
QBBrock ThomasProjected PPR: 16.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts20.027.1—
Completions9.015.9—
Passing yds54.0205.3—
Passing TD0.01.5—
Interceptions1.00.5—
Rushing yds5.020.3—
Rushing TD0.00.2—
Fumbles lost———
QBCarson BoydProjected PPR: 10.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts0.021.81
Completions0.013.11
Passing yds0.0162.25
Passing TD0.01.00
Interceptions0.00.70
Rushing yds4.79.421
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Dierre Hill Jr.Projected PPR: 17.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.514.213
Rushing yds70.581.783
Rushing TD0.00.80
Receptions3.01.83
Receiving yds11.024.011
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Aidan LaugheryProjected PPR: 12.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.312.813
Rushing yds77.359.3123
Rushing TD0.00.51
Receptions2.01.70
Receiving yds7.014.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Dakorien MooreProjected PPR: 13.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets11.58.0—
Receptions5.54.79
Receiving yds56.564.170
Receiving TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Collin DixonProjected PPR: 17.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets11.210.6—
Receptions8.46.46
Receiving yds109.078.465
Receiving TD1.80.61
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Messiah HamptonProjected PPR: 7.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.54.7—
Receptions5.52.9—
Receiving yds54.029.9—
Receiving TD1.00.3—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Hudson ClementProjected PPR: 12.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.37.3—
Receptions4.54.5—
Receiving yds67.363.1—
Receiving TD0.20.3—
Fumbles lost———
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

TENN @ SC
Kickoff: 69°F · Wind 10 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
TENN 1–1SC 0–3
FINAL
24–27
TENN -3.6
Vegas TENN +2.5
Spreads
TENN +2.5PREMIUM ★
BBMI Loss
+6.1
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Tennessee68.16.1236.4178.12.21.1
South Carolina66.95.8223.9162.32.81.3

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Tennessee
South Carolina
QBGeorge MacIntyreProjected PPR: 16.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts23.327.823
Completions15.718.616
Passing yds176.7227.5136
Passing TD0.31.60
Interceptions1.00.60
Rushing yds-7.311.29
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——1
QBLaNorris SellersProjected PPR: 19.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.329.532
Completions19.218.618
Passing yds222.7228.4210
Passing TD2.01.41
Interceptions0.70.81
Rushing yds74.850.196
Rushing TD0.30.32
Fumbles lost——0
RB1DeSean BishopProjected PPR: 19.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries23.820.932
Rushing yds152.2106.2120
Rushing TD1.81.01
Receptions0.81.11
Receiving yds6.213.110
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Matt FullerProjected PPR: 12.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.012.19
Rushing yds95.256.828
Rushing TD1.00.60
Receptions3.21.62
Receiving yds28.214.52
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Braylon StaleyProjected PPR: 11.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets11.06.7—
Receptions7.04.56
Receiving yds53.045.356
Receiving TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Donovan MurphProjected PPR: 5.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.32.9—
Receptions1.51.91
Receiving yds31.826.68
Receiving TD0.50.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Mike MatthewsProjected PPR: 15.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.37.7—
Receptions4.15.15
Receiving yds68.779.147
Receiving TD0.40.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Mazeo Bennett Jr.Projected PPR: 11.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.66.7—
Receptions4.64.26
Receiving yds41.644.788
Receiving TD0.40.41
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

Sacramento St. @ BALL
Kickoff: 67°F · Wind 4 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
Sacramento St. 0–1BALL 1–3
FINAL
17–34
Sacramento St. +7.1
Vegas Sacramento St. +14.5
Spreads
Sacramento St. +14.5PREMIUM
BBMI Loss
+7.4
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Sacramento State62.75.3189.3145.11.91.0
Ball State64.26.0213.6171.82.01.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Sacramento State
Ball State
QBJackson SharmanProjected PPR: 13.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts32.226.627
Completions17.715.417
Passing yds178.8187.1187
Passing TD1.01.12
Interceptions1.00.60
Rushing yds5.214.4-19
Rushing TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——1
QBKeldric LusterProjected PPR: 20.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts30.526.427
Completions19.717.114
Passing yds178.0213.9234
Passing TD1.21.52
Interceptions0.70.62
Rushing yds39.345.768
Rushing TD0.20.41
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Isaiah EneProjected PPR: 8.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries9.210.310
Rushing yds40.847.257
Rushing TD0.00.30
Receptions0.80.83
Receiving yds7.26.714
Fumbles lost——0
RB1TJ HortonProjected PPR: 11.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries9.011.99
Rushing yds107.559.633
Rushing TD1.00.52
Receptions2.51.61
Receiving yds3.08.8-5
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Matt ColemanProjected PPR: 11.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.87.6—
Receptions6.24.23
Receiving yds94.556.519
Receiving TD1.00.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR1CJ NelsonProjected PPR: 5.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.53.0—
Receptions1.81.91
Receiving yds13.823.07
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Raiden BrownProjected PPR: 6.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets12.04.2—
Receptions6.02.53
Receiving yds61.031.220
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jamarion McDougleProjected PPR: 9.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.85.6—
Receptions4.03.72
Receiving yds35.044.363
Receiving TD0.20.31
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

BYU @ UCF
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 78°F · Wind 14 mph · Rain Shower

Precipitation: 0.2 mm at kickoff. This is an amount, not a chance of rain.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
BYU 3–0UCF 0–1
FINAL
31–39
BYU -12.8
Vegas BYU -7.5
No pick
+5.3
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
BYU65.96.0219.5173.91.31.1
UCF60.55.1194.9113.31.61.4

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

BYU
UCF
QBBear BachmeierProjected PPR: 20.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts25.328.232
Completions16.718.116
Passing yds209.5215.7257
Passing TD1.51.62
Interceptions0.30.71
Rushing yds48.742.137
Rushing TD1.00.41
Fumbles lost——0
QBKeyone JenkinsProjected PPR: 13.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts28.529.141
Completions19.817.625
Passing yds191.0195.0293
Passing TD1.81.13
Interceptions0.81.00
Rushing yds16.818.635
Rushing TD0.80.21
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Preston RexProjected PPR: 12.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries5.710.25
Rushing yds30.253.642
Rushing TD0.30.60
Receptions1.31.80
Receiving yds7.817.50
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Duke WatsonProjected PPR: 8.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.811.815
Rushing yds92.847.894
Rushing TD0.60.30
Receptions0.61.31
Receiving yds0.09.95
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jojo PhillipsProjected PPR: 5.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.73.6—
Receptions2.02.42
Receiving yds15.223.339
Receiving TD0.20.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Josh DerryProjected PPR: 11.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.37.2—
Receptions6.74.36
Receiving yds69.749.754
Receiving TD0.70.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Kyler KasperProjected PPR: 13.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.37.2—
Receptions3.34.66
Receiving yds40.755.2129
Receiving TD0.50.51
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Waden CharlesProjected PPR: 6.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.34.2—
Receptions3.72.52
Receiving yds51.732.518
Receiving TD0.70.10
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

BGSU @ BUF
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 64°F · Wind 5 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
BGSU 0–2BUF 1–1–1
FINAL
24–31
BUF -6.9
Vegas BUF -3.0
No pick
+3.9
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Bowling Green60.64.9161.6134.62.31.1
Buffalo61.75.1154.5160.12.71.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Bowling Green
Buffalo
QBJay KastantinProjected PPR: 11.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts23.923.927
Completions16.014.719
Passing yds171.1166.1217
Passing TD1.00.93
Interceptions0.60.62
Rushing yds19.121.534
Rushing TD0.10.10
Fumbles lost——0
QBJason WrightProjected PPR: 12.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.824.621
Completions13.213.913
Passing yds144.5164.5127
Passing TD1.00.91
Interceptions0.70.70
Rushing yds34.522.935
Rushing TD0.30.20
Fumbles lost——1
RB1Austyn DendyProjected PPR: 10.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.815.810
Rushing yds50.361.639
Rushing TD0.70.50
Receptions0.30.63
Receiving yds1.26.73
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Messiah BurchProjected PPR: 13.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries21.016.833
Rushing yds114.884.5184
Rushing TD0.40.63
Receptions0.80.70
Receiving yds2.05.60
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Brennan RidleyProjected PPR: 6.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets11.04.5—
Receptions9.02.72
Receiving yds95.034.712
Receiving TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Chance MorrowProjected PPR: 12.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets11.68.2—
Receptions6.44.74
Receiving yds77.257.639
Receiving TD1.20.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Winn SharpProjected PPR: 7.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.04.5—
Receptions4.72.75
Receiving yds49.731.550
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Dwayne Early Jr.Projected PPR: 4.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.93.0—
Receptions1.71.72
Receiving yds24.423.324
Receiving TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

BC @ GT
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 68°F · Wind 8 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
BC 0–1GT 0–1
FINAL
49–27
GT -10.4
Vegas GT -6.5
No pick
+3.9
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Boston College62.25.3199.4129.42.61.2
Georgia Tech66.86.4254.0172.71.31.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Boston College
Georgia Tech
QBMason McKenzieProjected PPR: 19.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.829.617
Completions16.317.79
Passing yds210.2207.9101
Passing TD1.21.11
Interceptions1.20.80
Rushing yds90.057.0170
Rushing TD0.50.42
Fumbles lost——0
QBAlberto MendozaProjected PPR: 19.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts32.030.624
Completions22.520.217
Passing yds254.5254.0186
Passing TD1.52.01
Interceptions0.70.72
Rushing yds13.517.621
Rushing TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Bo MacCormack IIIProjected PPR: 7.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries7.27.820
Rushing yds22.231.6155
Rushing TD0.20.33
Receptions1.01.02
Receiving yds8.811.613
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Trelain MaddoxProjected PPR: 17.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.017.07
Rushing yds93.085.624
Rushing TD1.00.90
Receptions3.01.54
Receiving yds16.015.515
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Johnathan Montague Jr.Projected PPR: 6.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.04.0—
Receptions5.02.41
Receiving yds72.031.59
Receiving TD1.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jordan AllenProjected PPR: 15.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets10.08.2—
Receptions8.05.34
Receiving yds89.567.585
Receiving TD0.20.50
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Dawson PoughProjected PPR: 6.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.04.2—
Receptions4.02.5—
Receiving yds106.031.3—
Receiving TD1.00.2—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Dalen PensonProjected PPR: 10.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.05.2—
Receptions4.53.55
Receiving yds63.551.988
Receiving TD0.20.31
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

OU @ MSST
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 73°F · Wind 5 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
OU 2–0MSST 0–2
FINAL
23–15
MSST -1.6
Vegas MSST +1.5
No pick
+3.1
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Oklahoma70.05.4217.6159.52.71.3
Mississippi State67.25.3199.5156.63.51.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Oklahoma
Mississippi State
QBJohn MateerProjected PPR: 19.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts29.332.029
Completions18.819.122
Passing yds218.0225.4283
Passing TD1.51.42
Interceptions1.20.90
Rushing yds29.045.237
Rushing TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
QBParker PuckettProjected PPR: 15.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts26.027.324
Completions16.016.317
Passing yds121.0197.3158
Passing TD0.01.11
Interceptions1.00.71
Rushing yds55.030.137
Rushing TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——1
RB1Lloyd AvantProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries11.011.313
Rushing yds60.352.255
Rushing TD0.70.50
Receptions1.31.11
Receiving yds7.78.69
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Kolin WilsonProjected PPR: 12.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.013.75
Rushing yds49.063.016
Rushing TD0.00.60
Receptions1.01.23
Receiving yds7.512.315
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Isaiah Sategna IIIProjected PPR: 15.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.69.8—
Receptions6.25.88
Receiving yds81.069.7164
Receiving TD0.40.41
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Anthony Evans IIIProjected PPR: 15.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets10.59.7—
Receptions7.86.06
Receiving yds102.372.633
Receiving TD0.80.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Manny ChoiceProjected PPR: 8.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.04.8—
Receptions5.02.91
Receiving yds98.040.93
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Zion RaginsProjected PPR: 6.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.54.3—
Receptions3.02.52
Receiving yds49.029.621
Receiving TD1.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

UNT @ NAVY
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 58°F · Wind 6 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
UNT 1–1NAVY 1–1
FINAL
49–39
NAVY 0.0
Vegas NAVY +3.0
No pick
+3.0
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
North Texas64.26.7237.0190.91.51.0
Navy64.75.899.3279.01.31.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

North Texas
Navy
QBTayven JacksonProjected PPR: 17.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts33.027.123
Completions23.817.717
Passing yds308.7225.8305
Passing TD2.51.63
Interceptions0.70.61
Rushing yds12.720.0-8
Rushing TD0.30.20
Fumbles lost——0
QBJackson GutierrezProjected PPR: 24.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts10.613.610
Completions5.07.57
Passing yds111.898.1133
Passing TD1.20.71
Interceptions0.20.30
Rushing yds131.2115.3228
Rushing TD1.41.23
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jahiem WhiteProjected PPR: 18.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries16.015.420
Rushing yds114.593.7174
Rushing TD1.50.92
Receptions3.82.14
Receiving yds32.019.958
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Michael BarrowProjected PPR: 12.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries9.713.521
Rushing yds56.870.192
Rushing TD0.00.71
Receptions1.00.71
Receiving yds7.24.815
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Justin StevensonProjected PPR: 12.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets10.37.0—
Receptions8.34.68
Receiving yds107.356.2209
Receiving TD1.00.42
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Luke HutchisonProjected PPR: 3.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.01.8—
Receptions3.01.00
Receiving yds48.013.70
Receiving TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Kyle KochProjected PPR: 6.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.03.5—
Receptions4.02.34
Receiving yds55.028.328
Receiving TD1.00.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Truman BrasfieldProjected PPR: 3.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets3.02.1—
Receptions1.01.21
Receiving yds55.020.29
Receiving TD0.70.10
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

TA&M @ ALA
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 74°F · Wind 6 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
TA&M 3–1ALA –
FINAL
20–31
ALA -16.3
Vegas ALA -13.5
No pick
+2.8
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Texas A&M60.15.1191.5115.91.81.5
Alabama65.26.5254.1169.92.51.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Texas A&M
Alabama
QBMarcel ReedProjected PPR: 13.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.329.121
Completions17.317.414
Passing yds182.8193.7163
Passing TD1.01.11
Interceptions1.01.12
Rushing yds40.522.923
Rushing TD0.30.21
Fumbles lost——1
QBKeelon RussellProjected PPR: 23.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.730.430
Completions18.420.019
Passing yds249.4259.9311
Passing TD1.72.13
Interceptions0.60.61
Rushing yds51.137.220
Rushing TD0.70.30
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Rueben Owens IIProjected PPR: 7.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.09.32
Rushing yds58.237.918
Rushing TD0.20.30
Receptions1.41.00
Receiving yds11.27.60
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Daniel HillProjected PPR: 12.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.09.29
Rushing yds59.549.136
Rushing TD1.00.60
Receptions1.51.82
Receiving yds8.518.717
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Isaiah HortonProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.66.1—
Receptions2.83.83
Receiving yds41.846.134
Receiving TD0.60.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Rico ScottProjected PPR: 14.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.06.9—
Receptions4.04.56
Receiving yds55.060.3156
Receiving TD1.00.60
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Ashton Bethel-RomanProjected PPR: 6.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.04.1—
Receptions2.02.4—
Receiving yds24.026.0—
Receiving TD0.00.2—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Derek MeadowsProjected PPR: 4.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.02.6—
Receptions3.01.6—
Receiving yds44.020.5—
Receiving TD0.00.2—
Fumbles lost———
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

MSU @ UCLA
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 75°F · Wind 9 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
MSU 3–1UCLA –
FINAL
10–28
UCLA -18.5
Vegas UCLA -16.5
No pick
+2.0
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Michigan State59.24.6176.897.62.91.1
UCLA64.56.2202.3197.61.61.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Michigan State
UCLA
QBAlessio MilivojevicProjected PPR: 10.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts26.627.6—
Completions17.316.4—
Passing yds180.1184.2—
Passing TD1.00.9—
Interceptions0.40.8—
Rushing yds15.110.4—
Rushing TD0.10.0—
Fumbles lost———
QBTy DieffenbachProjected PPR: 18.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts33.025.031
Completions22.015.518
Passing yds264.0196.6198
Passing TD0.01.51
Interceptions1.00.60
Rushing yds4.030.517
Rushing TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jaziun PattersonProjected PPR: 9.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries16.513.6—
Rushing yds70.250.2—
Rushing TD1.00.3—
Receptions1.81.2—
Receiving yds11.89.5—
Fumbles lost———
RB1Wayne KnightProjected PPR: 14.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.013.215
Rushing yds95.272.656
Rushing TD1.80.71
Receptions2.31.80
Receiving yds16.813.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Fredrick MooreProjected PPR: 7.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.05.2—
Receptions4.03.11
Receiving yds33.038.89
Receiving TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Brian Rowe Jr.Projected PPR: 8.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.34.6—
Receptions3.33.03
Receiving yds52.038.374
Receiving TD0.00.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Rodney Bullard Jr.Projected PPR: 7.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.05.3—
Receptions3.23.0—
Receiving yds40.835.1—
Receiving TD0.20.2—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Landon EllisProjected PPR: 6.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets3.03.5—
Receptions0.02.11
Receiving yds0.028.72
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

HAW @ NIU
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 67°F · Wind 9 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
HAW 2–2NIU 2–0
FINAL
56–21
HAW -4.0
Vegas HAW -3.0
No pick
+1.0
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Hawaii68.15.7259.1129.32.21.2
Northern Illinois62.85.5197.1145.62.41.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Hawaii
Northern Illinois
QBMicah AlejadoProjected PPR: 19.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts44.136.532
Completions25.922.622
Passing yds266.1264.3323
Passing TD0.91.83
Interceptions0.70.81
Rushing yds21.125.70
Rushing TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
QBTaron DickensProjected PPR: 14.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts30.727.226
Completions20.216.817
Passing yds198.8202.5171
Passing TD0.71.32
Interceptions0.50.62
Rushing yds18.821.222
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Cam BarfieldProjected PPR: 10.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries9.010.816
Rushing yds24.549.458
Rushing TD0.00.51
Receptions0.51.23
Receiving yds-2.59.370
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Telly Johnson Jr.Projected PPR: 14.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.516.614
Rushing yds79.778.363
Rushing TD0.70.70
Receptions1.81.20
Receiving yds7.79.60
Fumbles lost——2
WR1Devin AlvesProjected PPR: 8.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.54.2—
Receptions4.02.71
Receiving yds98.544.29
Receiving TD0.50.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR1DeAree RogersProjected PPR: 14.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets10.78.8—
Receptions8.25.58
Receiving yds70.362.8115
Receiving TD0.30.42
Fumbles lost——1
WR2Audric HarrisProjected PPR: 8.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.04.8—
Receptions2.33.12
Receiving yds36.342.690
Receiving TD0.20.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2La'Don BryantProjected PPR: 10.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.05.5—
Receptions4.33.44
Receiving yds49.049.130
Receiving TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

IOWA @ MINN
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 69°F · Wind 11 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
IOWA 0–1MINN 0–2
FINAL
10–13
IOWA -8.0
Vegas IOWA -7.5
No pick
+0.5
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Iowa64.55.5203.4152.72.31.0
Minnesota62.35.2217.5104.32.01.2

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Iowa
Minnesota
QBJeremy HecklinskiProjected PPR: 12.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts19.024.916
Completions14.015.59
Passing yds202.0186.262
Passing TD3.01.20
Interceptions0.00.61
Rushing yds0.07.50
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
QBDrake LindseyProjected PPR: 13.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts32.832.426
Completions21.219.914
Passing yds221.8222.0137
Passing TD1.51.30
Interceptions0.80.91
Rushing yds1.05.3-11
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Kamari MoultonProjected PPR: 15.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.218.010
Rushing yds103.885.322
Rushing TD0.80.70
Receptions1.81.40
Receiving yds6.29.50
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Darius TaylorProjected PPR: 12.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.611.812
Rushing yds32.241.920
Rushing TD0.80.31
Receptions3.63.51
Receiving yds31.032.511
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Tony DiazProjected PPR: 13.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.27.6—
Receptions5.24.81
Receiving yds61.460.357
Receiving TD0.20.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Noah JenningsProjected PPR: 12.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.28.3—
Receptions5.85.01
Receiving yds72.059.27
Receiving TD0.20.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Reece Vander ZeeProjected PPR: 7.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.04.3—
Receptions3.02.84
Receiving yds69.037.269
Receiving TD1.00.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Javon TracyProjected PPR: 11.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.27.4—
Receptions5.34.57
Receiving yds62.551.345
Receiving TD0.20.30
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

KSU @ ASU
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 78°F · Wind 7 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
KSU 1–1ASU 3–0
FINAL
17–28
KSU -2.2
Vegas KSU -1.5
No pick
+0.7
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Kansas State67.66.3243.0179.61.31.0
Arizona State64.95.6223.3141.32.81.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Kansas State
Arizona State
QBAvery JohnsonProjected PPR: 22.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.229.4—
Completions19.718.5—
Passing yds214.2239.7—
Passing TD1.71.8—
Interceptions0.50.6—
Rushing yds76.748.1—
Rushing TD0.50.4—
Fumbles lost———
QBMikey KeeneProjected PPR: 14.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts34.027.620
Completions25.016.710
Passing yds256.0206.3160
Passing TD2.01.30
Interceptions0.00.60
Rushing yds0.013.2-6
Rushing TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Joe JacksonProjected PPR: 14.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries27.016.49
Rushing yds159.074.117
Rushing TD1.00.70
Receptions1.01.70
Receiving yds13.014.80
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Kyson BrownProjected PPR: 9.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.59.31
Rushing yds64.242.96
Rushing TD0.20.40
Receptions1.01.50
Receiving yds6.811.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jaron TibbsProjected PPR: 12.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.06.9—
Receptions5.54.49
Receiving yds63.254.357
Receiving TD0.80.41
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Reed HarrisProjected PPR: 16.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets11.79.2—
Receptions7.35.66
Receiving yds93.081.4147
Receiving TD1.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Josh ManningProjected PPR: 9.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.55.6—
Receptions4.53.57
Receiving yds44.544.757
Receiving TD0.50.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Omarion MillerProjected PPR: 12.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets10.07.7—
Receptions6.24.62
Receiving yds61.453.820
Receiving TD0.40.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

ULM @ TROY
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 72°F · Wind 7 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
ULM 0–1TROY 0–1
FINAL
21–14
TROY -19.1
Vegas TROY -13.5
No pick
+5.6
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Louisiana Monroe63.15.3192.4142.21.81.3
Troy68.46.2198.9223.02.41.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Louisiana Monroe
Troy
QBAidan ArmentaProjected PPR: 14.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.827.322
Completions18.216.613
Passing yds206.5188.5147
Passing TD1.21.12
Interceptions0.80.80
Rushing yds18.524.33
Rushing TD0.20.20
Fumbles lost——0
QBGoose CrowderProjected PPR: 19.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts28.224.9—
Completions16.014.9—
Passing yds185.3195.0—
Passing TD1.51.4—
Interceptions0.70.6—
Rushing yds53.048.7—
Rushing TD0.30.4—
Fumbles lost———
RB1CJ PhillipProjected PPR: 7.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries6.07.75
Rushing yds26.037.512
Rushing TD0.00.30
Receptions0.00.80
Receiving yds0.06.90
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jordan LovettProjected PPR: 14.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries10.013.317
Rushing yds50.079.370
Rushing TD0.00.70
Receptions2.00.93
Receiving yds4.011.4-10
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Nic TrujilloProjected PPR: 8.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.05.2—
Receptions3.53.22
Receiving yds63.039.030
Receiving TD1.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1TJ LottProjected PPR: 5.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.63.4—
Receptions1.42.01
Receiving yds15.025.132
Receiving TD0.20.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Parker FulghumProjected PPR: 5.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.03.9—
Receptions5.02.42
Receiving yds47.029.023
Receiving TD1.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Noreel WhiteProjected PPR: 8.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.84.8—
Receptions2.52.81
Receiving yds40.040.612
Receiving TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

EMU @ OHIO
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 67°F · Wind 3 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
EMU 1–2OHIO 1–0
FINAL
20–24
OHIO -15.8
Vegas OHIO -10.5
No pick
+5.3
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Eastern Michigan59.55.1194.1108.21.91.1
Ohio64.86.1179.3215.71.41.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Eastern Michigan
Ohio
QBNoah KimProjected PPR: 12.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts35.829.1—
Completions21.117.3—
Passing yds210.0195.0—
Passing TD1.41.1—
Interceptions0.50.8—
Rushing yds6.210.5—
Rushing TD0.40.1—
Fumbles lost———
QBNick PoulosProjected PPR: 17.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts21.321.329
Completions12.012.919
Passing yds162.3167.0266
Passing TD1.71.21
Interceptions0.00.50
Rushing yds62.349.022
Rushing TD0.30.41
Fumbles lost——1
RB1Joey MattordProjected PPR: 8.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.58.93
Rushing yds54.536.124
Rushing TD0.00.30
Receptions1.51.77
Receiving yds12.013.855
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Duncan BruneProjected PPR: 14.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.814.18
Rushing yds66.277.722
Rushing TD0.60.80
Receptions0.60.82
Receiving yds5.87.112
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Harold MackProjected PPR: 10.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.86.7—
Receptions4.54.03
Receiving yds47.845.930
Receiving TD0.80.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Preston BowmanProjected PPR: 7.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.54.7—
Receptions2.02.84
Receiving yds51.537.527
Receiving TD0.50.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Benson ProsperProjected PPR: 8.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.75.9—
Receptions7.03.44
Receiving yds73.336.86
Receiving TD0.30.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Dom DorwartProjected PPR: 6.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.53.5—
Receptions2.82.14
Receiving yds37.228.8125
Receiving TD0.50.21
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

ODU @ LT
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 80°F · Wind 6 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
ODU –LT 1–1
FINAL
0–26
ODU +9.6
Vegas ODU +13.5
No pick
+3.9
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Old Dominion61.64.4140.2130.43.21.5
Louisiana Tech67.05.6208.2165.02.31.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Old Dominion
Louisiana Tech
QBQuinn HenicleProjected PPR: 12.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts17.622.3—
Completions9.612.3—
Passing yds114.0138.0—
Passing TD0.60.6—
Interceptions0.80.9—
Rushing yds78.442.8—
Rushing TD0.80.3—
Fumbles lost———
QBBlake BakerProjected PPR: 17.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts24.226.334
Completions16.817.428
Passing yds211.8204.4303
Passing TD2.21.51
Interceptions0.20.70
Rushing yds14.229.112
Rushing TD0.20.31
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Devin RocheProjected PPR: 7.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.613.38
Rushing yds45.048.09
Rushing TD0.00.20
Receptions1.00.72
Receiving yds11.04.85
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Andrew BurnetteProjected PPR: 12.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.016.220
Rushing yds53.071.263
Rushing TD0.00.60
Receptions1.01.12
Receiving yds2.59.517
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Josh RodriguezProjected PPR: 7.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.34.9—
Receptions2.72.74
Receiving yds40.331.143
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Marcus Calwise Jr.Projected PPR: 7.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets10.04.6—
Receptions8.02.92
Receiving yds119.035.611
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2T.J. JohnsonProjected PPR: 6.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.55.0—
Receptions2.72.71
Receiving yds43.732.93
Receiving TD0.50.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jalen MickensProjected PPR: 14.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.88.1—
Receptions5.25.38
Receiving yds77.865.7110
Receiving TD0.50.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

UL @ USM
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 75°F · Wind 8 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
UL 2–1USM –
FINAL
31–35
UL -11.2
Vegas UL -10.0
No pick
+1.2
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Louisiana68.56.0197.9213.41.71.1
Southern Miss66.25.8239.7142.31.11.2

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Louisiana
Southern Miss
QBLunch WinfieldProjected PPR: 22.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts22.024.4—
Completions15.415.5—
Passing yds166.6195.0—
Passing TD0.61.4—
Interceptions0.60.6—
Rushing yds70.462.4—
Rushing TD1.10.7—
Fumbles lost———
QBLandry LyddyProjected PPR: 16.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts30.231.438
Completions18.218.721
Passing yds240.5226.5164
Passing TD1.81.50
Interceptions1.00.80
Rushing yds17.218.9-9
Rushing TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Steven BlancoProjected PPR: 10.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries7.49.813
Rushing yds31.351.233
Rushing TD0.60.60
Receptions0.70.90
Receiving yds3.79.60
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Steven RobinsonProjected PPR: 13.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries18.416.322
Rushing yds80.076.4145
Rushing TD1.00.53
Receptions1.61.64
Receiving yds11.413.717
Fumbles lost——1
WR1Shelton Sampson Jr.Projected PPR: 5.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets1.82.8—
Receptions0.81.85
Receiving yds16.524.458
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Mario SandersProjected PPR: 13.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.38.4—
Receptions5.75.06
Receiving yds85.064.177
Receiving TD0.80.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2KeDarius WadeProjected PPR: 7.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.33.7—
Receptions1.72.22
Receiving yds50.738.353
Receiving TD0.30.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Kaden SaundersProjected PPR: 7.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.04.5—
Receptions4.02.73
Receiving yds70.533.813
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

SJSU @ NEV
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 57°F · Wind 5 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
SJSU 1–1NEV 1–1
FINAL
13–28
NEV -6.6
Vegas NEV -5.5
No pick
+1.1
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
San Jose State68.55.3240.4121.12.01.4
Nevada69.95.4192.2187.32.31.2

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

San Jose State
Nevada
QBDaniel RolovichProjected PPR: 17.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts23.033.83
Completions12.020.50
Passing yds193.0239.10
Passing TD1.01.40
Interceptions0.00.90
Rushing yds48.025.7-2
Rushing TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
QBAJ BiancoProjected PPR: 16.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.026.0—
Completions14.515.6—
Passing yds153.0190.4—
Passing TD1.01.2—
Interceptions1.50.7—
Rushing yds30.532.8—
Rushing TD0.50.3—
Fumbles lost———
RB1Viliami TeuProjected PPR: 11.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries20.015.410
Rushing yds156.060.244
Rushing TD2.00.51
Receptions1.01.30
Receiving yds2.011.20
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Dominic KelleyProjected PPR: 15.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.516.624
Rushing yds83.377.282
Rushing TD0.70.71
Receptions2.01.82
Receiving yds17.016.119
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Carson ClarkProjected PPR: 16.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.410.4—
Receptions6.26.45
Receiving yds81.678.842
Receiving TD0.80.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Gary Givens IIIProjected PPR: 12.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.77.1—
Receptions2.74.34
Receiving yds32.060.445
Receiving TD0.30.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jase NixProjected PPR: 4.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets1.42.9—
Receptions1.11.81
Receiving yds12.920.24
Receiving TD0.10.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Marshaun BrownProjected PPR: 4.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.33.1—
Receptions1.31.85
Receiving yds16.022.352
Receiving TD0.20.11
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

BOIS @ WSU
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 55°F · Wind 5 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
BOIS 1–1WSU 2–1
FINAL
31–10
WSU +14.0
Vegas WSU +14.5
No pick
+0.5
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Boise State65.46.2213.5191.41.30.8
Washington State60.05.3194.5122.92.61.3

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Boise State
Washington State
QBMaddux MadsenProjected PPR: 17.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.726.823
Completions18.316.914
Passing yds216.0214.2149
Passing TD2.21.61
Interceptions0.00.50
Rushing yds21.521.534
Rushing TD0.20.30
Fumbles lost——0
QBOwen EshelmanProjected PPR: 16.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts49.026.940
Completions32.016.421
Passing yds289.0192.2191
Passing TD2.01.10
Interceptions1.00.91
Rushing yds149.043.133
Rushing TD1.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Dylan RileyProjected PPR: 17.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries21.616.613
Rushing yds138.090.5128
Rushing TD1.00.92
Receptions1.41.21
Receiving yds11.213.15
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Kirby VorheesProjected PPR: 6.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries8.77.95
Rushing yds36.332.28
Rushing TD0.00.21
Receptions1.71.01
Receiving yds9.07.28
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Akeem WrightProjected PPR: 7.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.03.6—
Receptions4.02.32
Receiving yds84.034.924
Receiving TD1.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Branden GanashamoorthyProjected PPR: 13.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.87.7—
Receptions5.04.74
Receiving yds66.464.758
Receiving TD0.60.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Ben FordProjected PPR: 5.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.03.3—
Receptions3.52.0—
Receiving yds47.026.6—
Receiving TD0.50.2—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Daniel BloodProjected PPR: 9.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.85.4—
Receptions4.83.54
Receiving yds50.543.043
Receiving TD0.20.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

SDSU @ CSU
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 54°F · Wind 9 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
SDSU 1–0CSU 1–1
FINAL
49–56
CSU +1.1
Vegas CSU +1.5
No pick
+0.4
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
San Diego State69.26.1210.6212.51.51.3
Colorado State68.56.2262.3165.02.11.2

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

San Diego State
Colorado State
QBStone SaundersProjected PPR: 15.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts11.023.833
Completions6.014.823
Passing yds61.0189.7369
Passing TD0.01.32
Interceptions0.00.72
Rushing yds-2.019.9-1
Rushing TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
QBK'saan FarrarProjected PPR: 19.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts33.831.7—
Completions20.820.2—
Passing yds217.8259.5—
Passing TD1.21.9—
Interceptions0.50.9—
Rushing yds14.220.8—
Rushing TD0.20.2—
Fumbles lost———
RB1Lucky SuttonProjected PPR: 15.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries18.316.922
Rushing yds83.089.098
Rushing TD1.00.82
Receptions0.30.80
Receiving yds1.36.90
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Durell RobinsonProjected PPR: 12.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.812.819
Rushing yds54.464.286
Rushing TD1.00.62
Receptions1.01.31
Receiving yds4.211.828
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Bert Emanuel Jr.Projected PPR: 6.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets1.83.2—
Receptions1.32.14
Receiving yds19.029.629
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jaivyn MooreProjected PPR: 4.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets1.62.5—
Receptions0.61.62
Receiving yds3.220.241
Receiving TD0.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jaylon HawkinsProjected PPR: 8.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.04.5—
Receptions3.52.86
Receiving yds63.536.6164
Receiving TD0.50.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Jackson HarperProjected PPR: 9.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.75.4—
Receptions5.03.44
Receiving yds67.043.659
Receiving TD0.30.30
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

GAST @ ARST
Kickoff: 72°F · Wind 3 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
GAST 2–2ARST 3–1
FINAL
32–38
ARST -3.5
Vegas ARST +2.5
Spreads
ARST +2.5PREMIUM ★
BBMI Win
+6.0
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Georgia State65.06.5248.4171.71.21.1
Arkansas State64.76.2236.9164.72.01.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Georgia State
Arkansas State
QBCameran BrownProjected PPR: 19.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts26.227.910
Completions17.218.08
Passing yds216.5237.165
Passing TD2.21.81
Interceptions0.80.70
Rushing yds32.027.3-9
Rushing TD0.20.30
Fumbles lost——0
QBTrey OwensProjected PPR: 20.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts28.930.332
Completions19.719.221
Passing yds230.9239.5309
Passing TD1.31.82
Interceptions0.90.60
Rushing yds34.934.136
Rushing TD0.30.32
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Dennis Murray Jr.Projected PPR: 12.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries7.210.07
Rushing yds39.050.466
Rushing TD0.50.50
Receptions2.21.93
Receiving yds25.020.658
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Kenyon ClayProjected PPR: 11.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.59.611
Rushing yds49.550.577
Rushing TD1.00.40
Receptions2.02.11
Receiving yds44.521.75
Fumbles lost——0
WR1DJ RilesProjected PPR: 9.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.54.8—
Receptions3.53.22
Receiving yds49.039.57
Receiving TD0.00.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jaylen BonelliProjected PPR: 10.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.05.7—
Receptions6.03.77
Receiving yds78.047.5150
Receiving TD0.00.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Rodshaun DorseyProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.75.4—
Receptions4.03.53
Receiving yds67.349.185
Receiving TD0.70.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Hunter SummersProjected PPR: 13.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.67.2—
Receptions4.44.5—
Receiving yds60.362.0—
Receiving TD0.40.4—
Fumbles lost———
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

VT @ CLEM
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 59°F · Wind 9 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
VT 0–1CLEM 1–1
FINAL
20–16
VT -2.5
Vegas VT +3.0
No pick
+5.5
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Virginia Tech68.65.7237.7155.53.01.1
Clemson68.95.6243.6145.12.61.3

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Virginia Tech
Clemson
QBEthan GrunkemeyerProjected PPR: 18.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts32.931.632
Completions23.720.920
Passing yds282.1245.2156
Passing TD2.11.62
Interceptions0.30.70
Rushing yds12.422.414
Rushing TD0.70.30
Fumbles lost——0
QBTait ReynoldsProjected PPR: 19.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.233.226
Completions19.821.120
Passing yds198.5251.2153
Passing TD0.21.50
Interceptions0.80.90
Rushing yds32.533.063
Rushing TD0.00.31
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jeffrey Overton Jr.Projected PPR: 15.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries16.214.210
Rushing yds93.873.426
Rushing TD0.20.60
Receptions3.82.31
Receiving yds31.223.3-5
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Gideon DavidsonProjected PPR: 10.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.212.714
Rushing yds74.257.662
Rushing TD0.80.50
Receptions0.81.20
Receiving yds1.88.90
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Que'Sean BrownProjected PPR: 15.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.58.6—
Receptions6.85.75
Receiving yds122.272.269
Receiving TD0.80.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1T.J. MooreProjected PPR: 15.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.09.2—
Receptions4.75.83
Receiving yds52.368.925
Receiving TD0.30.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Davion BrownProjected PPR: 5.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.63.2—
Receptions1.72.11
Receiving yds25.425.86
Receiving TD0.10.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Bryant Wesco Jr.Projected PPR: 16.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.28.9—
Receptions5.05.75
Receiving yds63.081.338
Receiving TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

COLO @ OKST
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 73°F · Wind 8 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
COLO 1–1OKST 1–0
FINAL
24–57
OKST -17.2
Vegas OKST -13.5
No pick
+3.7
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Colorado66.74.9189.7138.92.91.4
Oklahoma State72.76.3264.3191.21.31.3

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Colorado
Oklahoma State
QBIsaac WilsonProjected PPR: 14.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts33.728.927
Completions18.716.719
Passing yds234.0188.3280
Passing TD1.31.02
Interceptions1.70.92
Rushing yds30.333.516
Rushing TD0.00.31
Fumbles lost——1
QBDrew MestemakerProjected PPR: 19.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts34.033.036
Completions22.720.821
Passing yds324.0257.6386
Passing TD2.71.94
Interceptions1.00.80
Rushing yds29.322.28
Rushing TD0.30.20
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jaquail SmithProjected PPR: 10.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries10.313.113
Rushing yds65.757.139
Rushing TD0.00.40
Receptions1.00.81
Receiving yds23.014.24
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Caleb HawkinsProjected PPR: 23.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries20.521.219
Rushing yds98.7106.3120
Rushing TD0.31.20
Receptions3.32.65
Receiving yds33.327.972
Fumbles lost——0
WR1DeAndre Moore Jr.Projected PPR: 9.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.56.6—
Receptions6.03.95
Receiving yds50.047.7106
Receiving TD0.00.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Justin BowickProjected PPR: 14.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.78.1—
Receptions6.75.05
Receiving yds120.362.2138
Receiving TD1.00.51
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Joseph WilliamsProjected PPR: 14.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets11.29.3—
Receptions6.45.49
Receiving yds75.664.2135
Receiving TD0.60.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Terrence LewisProjected PPR: 6.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets3.33.7—
Receptions2.32.32
Receiving yds28.226.311
Receiving TD0.30.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

MISS @ TEX
Kickoff: 80°F · Wind 6 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
MISS 2–0TEX 1–1
FINAL
27–34
TEX -10.8
Vegas TEX -3.0
Spreads
TEX -3.0PREMIUM ★
BBMI Win
+7.8
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Ole Miss71.75.8274.9143.02.11.4
Texas72.66.2259.5187.22.31.4

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Ole Miss
Texas
QBTrinidad ChamblissProjected PPR: 20.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts35.037.252
Completions23.523.725
Passing yds279.7279.9250
Passing TD2.31.92
Interceptions0.71.03
Rushing yds27.829.27
Rushing TD1.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
QBArch ManningProjected PPR: 21.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts27.833.230
Completions17.720.818
Passing yds215.3264.3212
Passing TD1.81.91
Interceptions0.81.02
Rushing yds33.834.92
Rushing TD0.00.32
Fumbles lost——1
RB1Makhi FrazierProjected PPR: 10.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.011.96
Rushing yds73.056.247
Rushing TD0.00.50
Receptions0.00.85
Receiving yds0.09.716
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Hollywood SmothersProjected PPR: 13.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.013.3—
Rushing yds55.065.1—
Rushing TD0.70.6—
Receptions1.71.8—
Receiving yds13.318.8—
Fumbles lost———
WR1Deuce AlexanderProjected PPR: 15.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.08.7—
Receptions5.85.48
Receiving yds87.273.287
Receiving TD0.80.50
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Ryan WingoProjected PPR: 13.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.07.6—
Receptions6.04.87
Receiving yds81.359.8111
Receiving TD0.30.41
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Horatio FieldsProjected PPR: 9.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.55.1—
Receptions5.03.43
Receiving yds50.042.450
Receiving TD0.00.32
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Cam ColemanProjected PPR: 14.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.07.8—
Receptions3.44.91
Receiving yds53.271.012
Receiving TD0.80.40
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

ISU @ ARIZ
Kickoff: 77°F · Wind 10 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
ISU 2–1ARIZ 3–0
FINAL
3–39
ARIZ -19.4
Vegas ARIZ -12.5
Spreads
ARIZ -12.5PREMIUM ★
BBMI Win
+6.9
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Iowa State61.35.1184.3127.61.71.2
Arizona66.96.8274.8177.41.60.9

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Iowa State
Arizona
QBJaylen RaynorProjected PPR: 13.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts24.727.210
Completions14.216.28
Passing yds166.8183.1106
Passing TD1.21.00
Interceptions0.70.90
Rushing yds35.023.7-21
Rushing TD0.50.20
Fumbles lost——1
QBNoah FifitaProjected PPR: 23.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.532.234
Completions23.021.027
Passing yds289.8271.7308
Passing TD2.72.02
Interceptions0.70.60
Rushing yds30.832.118
Rushing TD0.50.40
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Aiden FloraProjected PPR: 11.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries17.814.312
Rushing yds110.262.436
Rushing TD0.80.40
Receptions2.01.63
Receiving yds13.815.715
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Kedrick ReescanoProjected PPR: 13.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries12.812.68
Rushing yds45.664.041
Rushing TD0.80.91
Receptions1.41.10
Receiving yds10.88.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jamal Polite Jr.Projected PPR: 5.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets3.54.0—
Receptions1.52.41
Receiving yds27.027.227
Receiving TD0.50.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Isaiah MizellProjected PPR: 10.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.05.3—
Receptions5.03.48
Receiving yds125.050.9134
Receiving TD1.00.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Cody JacksonProjected PPR: 6.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.04.3—
Receptions6.02.51
Receiving yds160.034.512
Receiving TD1.00.10
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Brandon PhelpsProjected PPR: 8.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.03.7—
Receptions4.02.55
Receiving yds88.036.633
Receiving TD1.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

USU @ TXST
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 82°F · Wind 12 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
USU 0–1TXST 1–0
FINAL
17–20
TXST -18.5
Vegas TXST -13.5
No pick
+5.0
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Utah State67.05.3211.4142.72.81.4
Texas State72.26.7235.6249.11.01.0

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Utah State
Texas State
QBGrady BrosterhousProjected PPR: 19.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts26.230.236
Completions14.817.721
Passing yds171.2212.8206
Passing TD1.41.20
Interceptions1.00.90
Rushing yds58.454.927
Rushing TD0.00.40
Fumbles lost——0
QBBrad JacksonProjected PPR: 25.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts26.526.237
Completions17.817.527
Passing yds240.3229.7167
Passing TD2.31.90
Interceptions0.80.50
Rushing yds67.359.815
Rushing TD0.70.61
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Javen JacobsProjected PPR: 11.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries14.712.714
Rushing yds91.357.242
Rushing TD0.30.40
Receptions2.32.12
Receiving yds10.313.213
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Torrance Burgess Jr.Projected PPR: 20.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries19.817.610
Rushing yds138.8100.951
Rushing TD0.81.30
Receptions1.61.43
Receiving yds15.414.79
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Eli WoodProjected PPR: 16.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.510.9—
Receptions6.06.21
Receiving yds78.778.07
Receiving TD0.80.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Beau SparksProjected PPR: 11.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets9.05.3—
Receptions7.03.66
Receiving yds86.052.338
Receiving TD0.50.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Javon RobinsonProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.06.0—
Receptions3.03.74
Receiving yds53.246.645
Receiving TD0.50.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Chris Dawn Jr.Projected PPR: 14.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.57.5—
Receptions5.05.17
Receiving yds57.761.848
Receiving TD0.70.50
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

SYR @ UNC
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 56°F · Wind 7 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
SYR 0–1UNC 1–2
FINAL
31–30
UNC -12.2
Vegas UNC -9.5
No pick
+2.7
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Syracuse63.84.9191.5120.42.81.4
North Carolina67.65.8214.5179.12.20.9

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Syracuse
North Carolina
QBMalachi NelsonProjected PPR: 11.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts34.028.2—
Completions21.016.3—
Passing yds266.0189.2—
Passing TD1.51.0—
Interceptions1.00.9—
Rushing yds8.014.0—
Rushing TD0.00.1—
Fumbles lost———
QBBilly Edwards Jr.Projected PPR: 18.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts26.329.444
Completions15.717.627
Passing yds209.8216.8271
Passing TD1.51.52
Interceptions0.80.60
Rushing yds19.328.5-14
Rushing TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Ahmad MillerProjected PPR: 9.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries16.013.130
Rushing yds100.556.5125
Rushing TD1.00.31
Receptions1.00.82
Receiving yds4.57.913
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jaylen McGillProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries5.010.512
Rushing yds28.756.662
Rushing TD0.30.50
Receptions0.20.82
Receiving yds3.37.613
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Umari HatcherProjected PPR: 16.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets13.010.1—
Receptions9.45.84
Receiving yds145.279.3103
Receiving TD1.40.41
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jordan ShippProjected PPR: 14.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.48.9—
Receptions6.25.48
Receiving yds83.270.1102
Receiving TD0.20.41
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Calvin Russell IIIProjected PPR: 7.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.54.8—
Receptions4.02.88
Receiving yds33.530.986
Receiving TD0.50.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Trech KekahunaProjected PPR: 6.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets2.53.8—
Receptions1.72.24
Receiving yds21.527.833
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

USC @ WIS
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 62°F · Wind 9 mph · Cloudy

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
USC 0–1WIS 2–1
FINAL
7–24
WIS +1.3
Vegas WIS +2.5
No pick
+1.2
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
USC65.15.9230.9150.81.71.1
Wisconsin63.25.4177.4166.31.91.4

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

USC
Wisconsin
QBJayden MaiavaProjected PPR: 16.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts32.331.550
Completions21.719.031
Passing yds292.1231.7258
Passing TD2.61.51
Interceptions0.40.82
Rushing yds2.715.0-57
Rushing TD0.30.20
Fumbles lost——0
QBColton JosephProjected PPR: 18.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts26.526.214
Completions14.514.612
Passing yds199.7180.658
Passing TD1.71.11
Interceptions0.80.90
Rushing yds59.358.732
Rushing TD0.70.40
Fumbles lost——0
RB1King MillerProjected PPR: 14.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries16.315.711
Rushing yds84.677.28
Rushing TD0.60.80
Receptions0.61.13
Receiving yds4.07.813
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Darrion DupreeProjected PPR: 9.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries19.010.5—
Rushing yds61.051.2—
Rushing TD0.00.4—
Receptions1.01.1—
Receiving yds2.010.1—
Fumbles lost———
WR1Trent MosleyProjected PPR: 13.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets11.07.9—
Receptions8.04.95
Receiving yds114.565.945
Receiving TD1.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Chris Brooks Jr.Projected PPR: 6.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets3.04.4—
Receptions1.02.51
Receiving yds10.031.516
Receiving TD0.00.11
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Tanook HinesProjected PPR: 9.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.55.2—
Receptions4.53.14
Receiving yds66.541.244
Receiving TD1.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Tyrell HenryProjected PPR: 9.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.87.2—
Receptions5.04.01
Receiving yds65.842.70
Receiving TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

VAN @ UK
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 65°F · Wind 4 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
VAN 1–1UK 0–2
FINAL
17–34
VAN +10.5
Vegas VAN +10.5
No pick
+0.0
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Vanderbilt61.45.7212.4137.52.41.1
Kentucky67.06.4251.4178.31.90.9

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Vanderbilt
Kentucky
QBJared CurtisProjected PPR: 17.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts30.828.136
Completions18.817.227
Passing yds236.4213.5247
Passing TD1.21.32
Interceptions1.40.71
Rushing yds37.836.56
Rushing TD0.40.30
Fumbles lost——1
QBKenny MincheyProjected PPR: 19.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts29.730.426
Completions20.120.119
Passing yds222.0256.0203
Passing TD1.91.81
Interceptions0.10.60
Rushing yds13.418.123
Rushing TD0.10.31
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Sedrick AlexanderProjected PPR: 8.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries9.08.83
Rushing yds43.741.84
Rushing TD1.00.30
Receptions1.71.43
Receiving yds18.313.629
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Jason PattersonProjected PPR: 16.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries11.315.612
Rushing yds55.781.044
Rushing TD0.00.90
Receptions0.71.81
Receiving yds8.014.86
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Junior SherrillProjected PPR: 14.8 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.78.6—
Receptions5.95.38
Receiving yds89.770.878
Receiving TD0.60.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR1DJ MillerProjected PPR: 9.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.55.2—
Receptions4.53.55
Receiving yds75.545.943
Receiving TD0.00.31
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Ja'Cory ThomasProjected PPR: 6.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets3.53.4—
Receptions3.02.13
Receiving yds37.529.435
Receiving TD0.00.21
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Nic AndersonProjected PPR: 9.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.04.8—
Receptions3.53.2—
Receiving yds35.543.3—
Receiving TD0.00.3—
Fumbles lost———
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

UTSA @ TULN
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 70°F · Wind 5 mph · Clear

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
UTSA 0–0–1TULN 1–3
FINAL
42–19
UTSA -3.1
Vegas UTSA -3.0
No pick
+0.1
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
UTSA69.36.2261.7165.32.21.2
Tulane66.45.5208.3158.31.71.2

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

UTSA
Tulane
QBOwen McCownProjected PPR: 19.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts31.731.323
Completions22.021.316
Passing yds225.9259.3173
Passing TD1.41.80
Interceptions0.30.72
Rushing yds20.319.320
Rushing TD0.00.21
Fumbles lost——0
QBTrace JohnsonProjected PPR: 14.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts21.028.044
Completions11.016.324
Passing yds165.0197.3265
Passing TD1.01.10
Interceptions1.00.72
Rushing yds16.025.1-35
Rushing TD0.00.20
Fumbles lost——1
RB1Will Henderson IIIProjected PPR: 14.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries13.413.415
Rushing yds80.065.8102
Rushing TD0.60.81
Receptions1.91.81
Receiving yds10.715.54
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Johnnie DanielsProjected PPR: 8.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries11.08.98
Rushing yds56.242.9104
Rushing TD0.00.41
Receptions0.00.71
Receiving yds0.09.31
Fumbles lost——1
WR1Mekhi AndersonProjected PPR: 10.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets7.05.4—
Receptions7.03.83
Receiving yds42.048.215
Receiving TD0.00.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Destyn HillProjected PPR: 11.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.57.5—
Receptions4.54.45
Receiving yds68.552.754
Receiving TD0.50.30
Fumbles lost——0
WR2David Amador IIProjected PPR: 13.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.47.7—
Receptions6.25.35
Receiving yds50.055.947
Receiving TD0.20.50
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Anthony Brown-StephensProjected PPR: 10.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.47.3—
Receptions3.04.0—
Receiving yds38.051.1—
Receiving TD0.20.2—
Fumbles lost———
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

North Dakota St. @ UNM
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 59°F · Wind 15 mph · Light Rain

Precipitation: 1.4 mm at kickoff. This is an amount, not a chance of rain.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
North Dakota St. 0–1UNM 2–1
FINAL
16–21
North Dakota St. +2.5
Vegas North Dakota St. +4.5
No pick
+2.0
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
North Dakota State61.34.9164.3138.02.21.2
New Mexico60.25.1148.4156.12.31.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

North Dakota State
New Mexico
QBNathan HayesProjected PPR: 11.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts23.324.333
Completions15.114.917
Passing yds181.7170.3198
Passing TD1.40.92
Interceptions0.70.82
Rushing yds34.320.910
Rushing TD0.60.10
Fumbles lost——0
QBToa Fa'avaeProjected PPR: 12.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts13.220.914
Completions7.412.18
Passing yds132.0144.792
Passing TD1.00.90
Interceptions0.60.71
Rushing yds52.231.625
Rushing TD0.40.20
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Myles MitchellProjected PPR: 9.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries16.713.210
Rushing yds67.054.134
Rushing TD0.70.40
Receptions1.00.90
Receiving yds4.06.60
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Kiefer SibleyProjected PPR: 8.5 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries17.011.313
Rushing yds87.050.891
Rushing TD0.00.31
Receptions0.00.81
Receiving yds0.08.5-3
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Jackson WilliamsProjected PPR: 10.2 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets6.66.1—
Receptions4.63.84
Receiving yds75.651.871
Receiving TD0.20.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1DJ DarlingProjected PPR: 6.0 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.03.5—
Receptions0.52.1—
Receiving yds17.527.2—
Receiving TD0.50.2—
Fumbles lost———
WR2Chris KielProjected PPR: 5.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.03.2—
Receptions3.51.92
Receiving yds39.021.619
Receiving TD0.50.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Bailen GeorgeProjected PPR: 7.7 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets4.55.0—
Receptions2.02.81
Receiving yds40.036.522
Receiving TD0.20.20
Fumbles lost——0
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

HOU @ UTAH
Priced, no pick
Kickoff: 50°F · Wind 5 mph · Fair

Precipitation: none forecast at kickoff.

Weather feeds the totals model. The spread model does not use it.

NCAAF totals are not published on the site yet.

Source: CollegeFootballData

Saved: Oct 24, 1:33 PM CDT

PREMIUM SPREADS · 2026
HOU –UTAH 1–1
FINAL
13–21
UTAH -9.5
Vegas UTAH -6.5
No pick
+3.0
Game breakdown

1. Projected box score

TeamPlaysYds/playPassing yds (net)Rushing ydsSackedTurnovers
Houston65.45.9221.4163.81.41.2
Utah67.66.6241.5206.11.61.1

Average of 200 simulated games.

2. Key player projections

Projected: average of the simulated games, assuming he starts. Season avg: his average in this season's starts (all his games this season if he hasn't started). Starters: each team's snap leader at the position in its latest game.

Houston
Utah
QBConner WeigmanProjected PPR: 19.3 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts28.329.235
Completions19.117.619
Passing yds252.0221.3282
Passing TD2.91.40
Interceptions0.30.80
Rushing yds35.440.720
Rushing TD0.90.40
Fumbles lost——1
QBDevon DampierProjected PPR: 24.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Attempts28.729.326
Completions19.518.218
Passing yds234.5242.0204
Passing TD2.52.00
Interceptions0.70.72
Rushing yds39.247.5150
Rushing TD0.50.62
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Makhi HughesProjected PPR: 11.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries16.713.119
Rushing yds81.758.352
Rushing TD0.30.61
Receptions2.01.01
Receiving yds16.710.06
Fumbles lost——0
RB1Wayshawn ParkerProjected PPR: 17.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Carries15.815.513
Rushing yds93.291.847
Rushing TD0.80.81
Receptions3.01.74
Receiving yds25.022.246
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Koby YoungProjected PPR: 6.4 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets3.13.6—
Receptions1.92.25
Receiving yds40.630.163
Receiving TD0.70.20
Fumbles lost——0
WR1Braden PeganProjected PPR: 16.1 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.58.6—
Receptions5.35.42
Receiving yds70.370.537
Receiving TD1.00.60
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Amare ThomasProjected PPR: 12.9 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets8.27.5—
Receptions5.44.55
Receiving yds66.059.6133
Receiving TD0.80.40
Fumbles lost——0
WR2Ricky JohnsonProjected PPR: 8.6 pts
StatSeason avgProjectedActual
Targets5.34.7—
Receptions2.72.8—
Receiving yds32.040.0—
Receiving TD0.00.3—
Fumbles lost———
3. Assumptions and methodology

Each game is simulated play by play 200 times from BBMI's team ratings, and the projections are the averages. Starters are assumed: each team's snap leaders in the game named on the card. Past accuracy is in the How the projections have done panel.

Since October 13, 2026 (week 7), the game card moves each team's share of combined rushing plays 30% of the way toward an even split in each simulation. Team-level passing play counts, simulated scores, totals, touchdowns and turnovers remain unchanged. Allocating team totals to players can also produce small random differences in player passing projections.

Showing 56 of 56 games · earliest start first
Lines shown are consensus at time of publish and may move. All results are model projections, not guarantees.