The whole record, one page
Spreads and totals, each shown twice: the premium cut the model actually publishes, and every tracked pick behind it. Both are graded against the closing line, and all four price at the same -110, so unlike the baseball products these win rates can be read against each other directly.
Calibration by edge
Spreads · 395 decidedEvery pick in this cut, split by the tier its edge places it in. This feed stores no tier on the pick, so the tier is APPLIED from the published thresholds rather than read off the row, and the group is headed as posted because it is what the published thresholds posted, not what today’s would. The total is the product card’s own cohort, which is what makes the two agree.
| EDGE (PTS) | TIER AS APPLIED | N | WIN % | ROI | ROI VS BREAK-EVEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS POSTED · THE TIER EACH PICK ACTUALLY FIRED UNDER | |||||
| Edge 6.0+ | Premium | 395 | 65.1% | +24.3% | |
| All picks by tier | TOTAL | 395 | 65.1% | +24.3% | |
| BY EDGE INTERVAL · DESCRIPTIVE, SAME PICKS | |||||
| 6.0 to 7.0 pts | Premium | 143 | 61.5% | +17.5% | |
| 7.0+ pts | Premium | 252 | 67.1% | +28.1% | |
The interval rows below do NOT add to the headline the way the tier rows do: a band counts every decided pick at that edge, which is what the thresholds are selecting from rather than what they delivered. This cut is a single tier by construction, so its tier split and its total are the same picks. The all-cut pill beside it is where the two bands separate.
Season to date
SpreadsCumulative win rate after each week, against the 52.4% break-even. The curve is the running rate, not each week's own, so a late swing moves it less than an early one.
| BY WEEK ▼ | PICKS | WIN % | ROI | CUMULATIVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/27 ’26 | 6 | 50.0% | -4.5% | 65.1% |
| 3/20 ’26 | 21 | 47.6% | -9.0% | 65.3% |
| 3/13 ’26 | 18 | 55.6% | +6.1% | 66.3% |
| 3/6 ’26 | 30 | 60.0% | +14.6% | 66.9% |
| 2/27 ’26 | 33 | 57.6% | +10.0% | 67.5% |
| 2/20 ’26 | 28 | 67.9% | +29.6% | 68.6% |
| 2/13 ’26 | 15 | 86.7% | +65.5% | 68.7% |
| 2/6 ’26 | 29 | 69.0% | +31.7% | 67.6% |
| 1/30 ’26 | 34 | 44.1% | -15.7% | 67.4% |
| 1/23 ’26 | 32 | 71.9% | +37.3% | 71.8% |
| 1/16 ’26 | 59 | 81.4% | +55.4% | 71.8% |
| 1/9 ’26 | 54 | 70.4% | +34.4% | 65.6% |
| 1/2 ’26 | 36 | 58.3% | +11.4% | 58.3% |
The log
395 rowsEvery pick in this cut, with the market’s number beside ours and which one landed closer. BBMI ERR and VEGAS ERR are each side’s projected margin against the actual, so CLOSER is decided by those two columns and nothing else.
| FINAL | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-02 | Stanford @ West Virginia | +1.5 | -4.5 | 6.0 | 66% | Premium | WIN | 77–82 | 0.5 | 6.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-29 | Tennessee @ Michigan | -7.5 | -13.5 | 6.0 | 90% | Premium | WIN | 62–95 | 19.5 | 25.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-29 | UConn @ Duke | -5.5 | -12.5 | 7.0 | 88% | Premium | LOSS | 73–72 | 13.5 | 6.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-27 | St. John's @ Duke | -6.5 | -13.5 | 7.0 | 90% | Premium | LOSS | 75–80 | 8.5 | 1.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-27 | Alabama @ Michigan | -9.5 | -15.5 | 6.0 | 93% | Premium | WIN | 77–90 | 2.5 | 3.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-27 | Michigan State @ UConn | -1.5 | +7.5 | 9.0 | 24% | Premium | LOSS | 63–67 | 11.5 | 2.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-26 | Texas @ Purdue | -7.5 | -16.5 | 9.0 | 94% | Premium | LOSS | 77–79 | 14.5 | 5.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-26 | Iowa @ Nebraska | -1.5 | -8.5 | 7.0 | 79% | Premium | LOSS | 77–71 | 14.5 | 7.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-26 | Illinois @ Houston | -3.5 | +6.5 | 10.0 | 27% | Premium | WIN | 65–55 | 3.5 | 13.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-26 | Arkansas @ Arizona | -7.5 | -13.5 | 6.0 | 90% | Premium | WIN | 88–109 | 7.5 | 13.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-25 | Illinois State @ Dayton | -7.5 | -14.5 | 7.0 | 91% | Premium | LOSS | 61–55 | 20.5 | 13.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-22 | Kentucky @ Iowa State | -4.5 | -10.5 | 6.0 | 84% | Premium | WIN | 63–82 | 8.5 | 14.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-22 | UNLV @ Tulsa | -4.5 | -11.5 | 7.0 | 86% | Premium | WIN | 66–77 | 0.5 | 6.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-22 | UCLA @ UConn | -4.5 | +1.5 | 6.0 | 45% | Premium | LOSS | 57–73 | 17.5 | 11.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-22 | Texas Tech @ Alabama | +1.5 | -6.5 | 8.0 | 73% | Premium | WIN | 65–90 | 18.5 | 26.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-21 | TCU @ Duke | -11.5 | -17.5 | 6.0 | 95% | Premium | WIN | 58–81 | 5.5 | 11.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-21 | Texas @ Gonzaga | -6.5 | -14.5 | 8.0 | 91% | Premium | LOSS | 74–68 | 20.5 | 12.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-21 | Vanderbilt @ Nebraska | +1.5 | -4.5 | 6.0 | 66% | Premium | WIN | 72–74 | 2.5 | 3.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-20 | Akron @ Texas Tech | -8.5 | +0.5 | 9.0 | 48% | Premium | LOSS | 71–91 | 20.5 | 11.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-20 | Wright State @ Virginia | -18.5 | -6.5 | 12.0 | 73% | Premium | WIN | 73–82 | 2.5 | 9.5 | BBMI |
| 2026-03-20 | Tennessee State @ Iowa State | -24.5 | -11.5 | 13.0 | 86% | Premium | LOSS | 74–108 | 22.5 | 9.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-20 | Hofstra @ Alabama | -11.5 | -2.5 | 9.0 | 59% | Premium | LOSS | 70–90 | 17.5 | 8.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-20 | Miami (OH) @ Tennessee | -11.5 | -2.5 | 9.0 | 59% | Premium | LOSS | 56–78 | 19.5 | 10.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-20 | Queens University @ Purdue | -25.5 | -12.5 | 13.0 | 88% | Premium | LOSS | 71–104 | 20.5 | 7.5 | VEGAS |
| 2026-03-20 | Prairie View A&M @ Florida | -35.5 | -14.5 | 21.0 | 91% | Premium | LOSS | 55–114 | 44.5 | 23.5 | VEGAS |
All picks locked before tip and graded against the closing line. Past performance is not a guarantee.