DATA-DRIVEN SPORTS INSIGHTS

Model the Game. Find the Edge.

Independent predictive models for baseball, basketball, and football. Every forecast is locked before the game, graded afterward, and kept on the record.

Data-driven models
Thousands of simulations power our probabilistic projections.
Verified performance
Every pick is graded in public. Nothing is hidden.
Market awareness
We compare our numbers to the market to find real edges.
Research first
Continuous testing and validation keep our models sharp.
MethodologyHow the NCAAB model works

A percentile-rank ensemble across a dozen measures of how a team actually plays, anchored on tempo-free efficiency, converted to a projected margin through a calibrated non-linear transformation.

What it reads

  • Tempo-free adjusted efficiency (points per 100 possessions, both ends)
  • Shooting, rebounding, turnover and free-throw rate differentials
  • Schedule quality, valued by the rank of the opponent
  • Recent form, and a cap on how far a team can move in a day
  • Venue effects measured per team from its own results, not one national average

What it produces

  • A composite strength score across all Division I
  • Projected spread and projected total
  • Win probability from the margin distribution
  • Tournament odds from bracket simulations in March

What we publish

  • Spread against the market, the primary product
  • Over/under
  • Rankings and bracket projections
Not claimed

The signal is in the architecture, not in the weights: audit testing found the weight surface essentially flat, so re-tuning the inputs buys almost nothing. The edge concentrates in games where the model most disagrees with the market.

Today’s predictions

View all picks
The 2025-26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

The Record

Full record
NCAA Basketball · flagship · 2,012 graded picks
AGAINST THE SPREAD · PREMIUM · EDGE ≥ 6 PTS
65.1%
Win rate · 95% CI 60.2–69.6%
+24.3%
ROI · flat 1u at −110
257-138
Record · 395 decided
44%break-even 52.4%76%
WIN RATE · CUMULATIVE · BY WEEKWin rateBreak-even
50%60%70%80%
65.1%
1/21/302/273/27
1/21/302/273/27
BBMI vs Vegas: 3,361 games, full 2026 season (model launch late Dec 2025) · winner accuracy 70.6% vs 68.0%BBMI vs Vegas →

Current research

View all

NCAAB Power Rankings

Full rankings
Final board
TOP OF THE BOARD
1Michigan+33.6
2Arizona+33.6
3Duke+32.8
4Purdue+29.9
BIG TEN
1Michigan+33.6
2Purdue+29.9
3Illinois+29.8
4Michigan State+29.8

Playoff Pulse

View all
Final · tournament complete
REACHED THE FINAL FOUR
1UConn100%
2Michigan100%
3Illinois100%
CHAMPION
1Michigan100%
Research delivered to your inbox
Get the latest models, experiments, and betting insights, straight to your inbox.
Join research list
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.