Team Pages/Amer/Tulsa
Tulsa logo
AMER • 2025–26 SEASON

Tulsa

Record 29-7vs line 11–7 ATSLast L 86–92 at AuburnTournament did not qualify
#60
BBMI rank
+23.4
Rating
#59
KenPom
#52
NET
Tulsa logo
Tulsa
#60 • +23.4 • Amer
SUN APR 5
86 92
final score
Auburn
#55 • +23.4neutral
Auburn logo
+0.5
Model line
+5.5
Market line
+5.0
Edge · Tracked ATS
48%
Win probability
Tulsa 48%Auburn 52%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
OCO
vs Oklahoma Christian OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN
W 100–57
Nov 7
Rhode Island logoat Rhode Island
W 82–65#204
Nov 13
Oral Roberts logoat Oral Roberts
W 88–87#327
Nov 18
Kansas State logoat Kansas State
L 83–84#230
Nov 22
Austin Peay logovs Austin Peay
W 84–75#96
Nov 25
San Jose State logoat San Jose State
W 81–51#297
Nov 26
Northern Iowa logovs Northern Iowa
W 63–60#58
Dec 2
MCT
vs Manhattan Christian Thunder
W 111–60
Dec 6
Missouri State logovs Missouri State
W 98–74#216
Dec 10
Arkansas-Pine Bluff logovs Arkansas-Pine Bluff
W 117–84#296
Dec 13
New Mexico State logoat New Mexico State
W 83–70#171
Dec 19
Western Kentucky logoat Western Kentucky
W 82–81#144
Dec 22
Denver logovs Denver
W 90–85#246
Dec 31
Rice logovs Rice
W 97–48#288
Jan 4
North Texas logoat North Texas
L 67–72#15876–6964%
Jan 10
South Florida logovs South Florida
L 78–93#2978–8180%
Jan 14
Charlotte logoat Charlotte
W 86–74#23485–7486%
Jan 18
UAB logoat UAB
W 99–77#9081–7452%
Jan 21
Memphis logovs Memphis
W 83–66#20681–7285%
Jan 24
Rice logoat Rice
W 87–81#28885–7292%
Jan 28
North Texas logovs North Texas
W 82–66#15876–6988%
Feb 1
Wichita State logovs Wichita State
W 93–83#9777–7684%
Feb 4
Florida Atlantic logoat Florida Atlantic
W 78–76#16982–7559%
Feb 8
South Florida logoat South Florida
L 74–80#2978–8246%
Feb 11
UAB logovs UAB
L 63–68#9082–7488%
Feb 14
Wichita State logoat Wichita State
L 77–81#9777–7753%
Feb 18
Charlotte logovs Charlotte
W 79–74#23485–7491%
Feb 22
U
vs UTSA
W 100–74#353100%
Feb 25
Tulane logoat Tulane
W 90–56#20884–7264%
Mar 5
East Carolina logoat East Carolina
W 93–66#28585–7083%
Mar 8
Temple logovs Temple
W 78–76#17083–7369%
Mar 13
North Texas logovs North Texas
W 90–84#15876–6969%
Mar 14
Wichita State logovs Wichita State
L 68–81#9777–7659%
Mar 17
Stephen F. Austin logovs Stephen F. Austin
W 89–84#7979–7556%
Mar 22
UNLV logovs UNLV
W 77–66#17684–7886%
Mar 24
Wichita State logovs Wichita State
W 83–79#9777–7670%
Apr 2
New Mexico logovs New Mexico
L 69–74#2878–8024%
Apr 5
Auburn logovs Auburn
L 86–92#5581–8448%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#36#50#64#78#92
#60
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
This team is not in the 2025–26 bracket.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#52
KenPom rank#59
NET rank#52
Quality wins-37.0#64
Rebound margin+3.9#40
Turnover margin-0.5#196
Assists per game14.8#89
Three-point margin+0.064#8
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Tulsa

2025–26 • ATS
76
Picks on Tulsa
41
Picks against
+3.0u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 18 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.