Team Pages/B10/Rutgers
Rutgers logo
B10 • 2025–26 SEASON

Rutgers

Record 14-19vs line 2–5 ATSLast L 69–82 at CreightonTournament did not qualify
#207
BBMI rank
+18.2
Rating
#122
KenPom
#134
NET
Rutgers logo
Rutgers
#207 • +18.2 • B10
THU APR 2
69 82
final score
Creighton
#129 • +20.9neutral
Creighton logo
+7.5
Model line
+4.5
Market line
-3.0
Edge · Tracked ATS
24%
Win probability
Rutgers 24%Creighton 76%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 5
Rider logovs Rider
W 81–53#357
Nov 10
Maine logovs Maine
W 72–60#323
Nov 14
Lehigh logovs Lehigh
W 84–72#226
Nov 18
American University logovs American University
W 80–71#205
Nov 21
Central Connecticut State logovs Central Connecticut State
L 54–67#203
Nov 24
Tennessee logoat Tennessee
L 60–85#17
Nov 25
Notre Dame logoat Notre Dame
L 63–68#201
Nov 27
UNLV logovs UNLV
W 80–65#176
Dec 2
Purdue logovs Purdue
L 65–81#4
Dec 6
Michigan logoat Michigan
L 60–101#1
Dec 13
Seton Hall logoat Seton Hall
L 59–81#57
Dec 20
Pennsylvania logovs Pennsylvania
W 70–69#142
Dec 29
Delaware State logovs Delaware State
W 65–50#355
Jan 2
Ohio State logovs Ohio State
L 73–80#27
Jan 5
Oregon logovs Oregon
W 88–85#15072–7214%
Jan 8
Illinois logoat Illinois
L 55–81#566–871%
Jan 11
Northwestern logovs Northwestern
W 77–75#6471–7628%
Jan 17
Wisconsin logoat Wisconsin
L 87–96#2670–843%
Jan 20
Iowa logoat Iowa
L 62–68#2566–802%
Jan 23
Indiana logovs Indiana
L 59–82#4271–7820%
Jan 27
Michigan State logovs Michigan State
L 79–88#665–815%
Jan 31
USC logoat USC
L 75–78#8571–7612%
Feb 3
UCLA logoat UCLA
L 66–98#2168–813%
Feb 7
Nebraska logovs Nebraska
L 68–80#764–785%
Feb 15
Maryland logovs Maryland
W 68–57#28273–7266%
Feb 18
Penn State logoat Penn State
W 85–72#21576–7539%
Feb 21
Minnesota logoat Minnesota
L 61–80#7769–7415%
Feb 24
Washington logovs Washington
L 72–79#7170–7731%
Mar 1
Maryland logoat Maryland
W 69–65#28272–7334%
Mar 5
Michigan State logoat Michigan State
L 87–91#664–812%
Mar 8
Penn State logovs Penn State
W 74–62#21577–7457%
Mar 11
Minnesota logovs Minnesota
W 72–67#7769–7320%
Mar 12
UCLA logovs UCLA
L 59–72#2168–8012%
Apr 2
Creighton logovs Creighton
L 69–82#12972–7624%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#197#215#233#251#268
#207
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
This team is not in the 2025–26 bracket.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#134
KenPom rank#122
NET rank#134
Quality wins-84.5#200
Rebound margin-4.6#309
Turnover margin+1.2#77
Assists per game12.2#267
Three-point margin-0.030#318
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Rutgers

2025–26 • ATS
10
Picks on Rutgers
15
Picks against
-3.2u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 7 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.