Team Pages/BSth/High Point
High Point logo
BSTH • 2025–26 SEASON

High Point

Record 31-5vs line 7–5 ATSLast L 88–94 at ArkansasTournament 12 seed, Round of 32
#44
BBMI rank
+24.3
Rating
#85
KenPom
#75
NET
High Point logo
High Point
#44 • +24.3 • BSth
SAT MAR 21
88 94
final score
Arkansas
#15 • +27.7neutral
Arkansas logo
+9.5
Model line
+11.5
Market line
+2.0
Edge · Tracked ATS
19%
Win probability
High Point 19%Arkansas 81%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 3
Furman logovs Furman
W 97–71#153
Nov 8
AC
vs Averett Cougars
W 127–52
Nov 12
Jacksonville logovs Jacksonville
W 85–64#326
Nov 15
UAB logoat UAB
L 74–91#90
Nov 18
Canisius logovs Canisius
W 93–50#339
Nov 20
Illinois-Chicago logoat Illinois-Chicago
W 90–80#82
Nov 23
Incarnate Word logovs Incarnate Word
W 91–80#311
Nov 29
Western Carolina logovs Western Carolina
W 93–73#279
Dec 3
Southern Illinois logovs Southern Illinois
L 84–86#143
Dec 5
NJIT logovs NJIT
W 89–72#337
Dec 14
Appalachian State logoat Appalachian State
L 78–86#134
Dec 16
MBF
vs Mary Baldwin Fighting Squirrels
W 129–47
Dec 19
La Salle logovs La Salle
W 84–72#283
Dec 22
Bryant logovs Bryant
W 93–47#348
Dec 28
PF
vs Pfeiffer Falcons
W 123–64
Dec 31
UNC Asheville logoat UNC Asheville
W 87–69#277
Jan 3
Longwood logovs Longwood
W 80–67#200
Jan 7
Gardner-Webb logovs Gardner-Webb
W 104–49#36493–64100%
Jan 10
Charleston Southern logoat Charleston Southern
W 84–82#27886–7475%
Jan 14
Winthrop logoat Winthrop
L 75–92#10084–7844%
Jan 17
USC Upstate logovs USC Upstate
W 89–69#29884–6799%
Jan 23
Radford logoat Radford
W 93–83#26486–7483%
Jan 29
Presbyterian logovs Presbyterian
W 84–81#26083–6899%
Jan 31
Longwood logoat Longwood
W 71–59#20084–7160%
Feb 4
Charleston Southern logovs Charleston Southern
W 80–55#27887–7397%
Feb 7
Radford logovs Radford
W 86–77#26488–7398%
Feb 12
USC Upstate logoat USC Upstate
W 95–70#29883–6781%
Feb 14
Gardner-Webb logoat Gardner-Webb
W 112–87#36492–65100%
Feb 19
UNC Asheville logovs UNC Asheville
W 74–48#27783–7095%
Feb 21
Winthrop logovs Winthrop
W 89–87#10085–7779%
Feb 26
Presbyterian logoat Presbyterian
W 79–73#26082–6987%
Mar 6
Gardner-Webb logovs Gardner-Webb
W 81–59#36493–64100%
Mar 7
UNC Asheville logovs UNC Asheville
W 75–71#27783–7088%
Mar 8
Winthrop logovs Winthrop
W 91–76#10085–7752%
Mar 19
Wisconsin logovs Wisconsin
W 83–82#2677–8637%
Mar 21
Arkansas logovs Arkansas
L 88–94#1578–8919%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#36#52#68#84#98
#44
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
12
Seed
West
Region
Round of 32
Finish
The bracket is resolved, so this is the result rather than a probability. It becomes an odds card again when the file carries fractions.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#75
KenPom rank#85
NET rank#75
Quality wins-15.0#42
Rebound margin-0.3#170
Turnover margin+5.1#2
Assists per game15.3#62
Three-point margin+0.029#75
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on High Point

2025–26 • ATS
42
Picks on High Point
33
Picks against
+1.4u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 12 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.