Team Pages/SEC/Auburn
Auburn logo
SEC • 2025–26 SEASON

Auburn

Record 20-16vs line 10–6 ATSLast W 92–86 vs TulsaTournament did not qualify
#55
BBMI rank
+23.4
Rating
#40
KenPom
#38
NET
Tulsa logo
Tulsa
#60 • +23.4 • Amer
SUN APR 5
86 92
final score
Auburn
#55 • +23.4neutral
Auburn logo
-0.5
Model line
-5.5
Market line
-5.0
Edge · Tracked ATS
52%
Win probability
Auburn 52%Tulsa 48%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
Bethune-Cookman logovs Bethune-Cookman
W 95–90#245
Nov 7
Merrimack logovs Merrimack
W 95–57#125
Nov 12
Wofford logovs Wofford
W 93–62#223
Nov 16
Houston logovs Houston
L 72–73#10
Nov 20
Jackson State logovs Jackson State
W 112–66#356
Nov 25
Oregon logoat Oregon
W 84–73#150
Nov 26
Michigan logoat Michigan
L 72–102#1
Nov 27
St. John's logovs St. John's
W 85–74#12
Dec 3
NC State logovs NC State
W 83–73#48
Dec 6
Arizona logoat Arizona
L 68–97#2
Dec 13
Chattanooga logovs Chattanooga
W 92–78#241
Dec 20
Purdue logoat Purdue
L 60–88#4
Dec 29
Queens University logovs Queens University
W 106–65#195
Jan 3
Georgia logoat Georgia
L 100–104#36
Jan 6
Texas A&M logovs Texas A&M
L 88–90#4181–8065%
Jan 10
Arkansas logovs Arkansas
W 95–73#1583–8756%
Jan 14
Missouri logoat Missouri
L 74–84#9180–7934%
Jan 17
South Carolina logovs South Carolina
W 71–67#21783–7380%
Jan 20
Ole Miss logoat Ole Miss
W 78–66#11478–7551%
Jan 24
Florida logoat Florida
W 76–67#873–8524%
Jan 28
Texas logovs Texas
W 88–82#7482–8175%
Jan 31
Tennessee logoat Tennessee
L 69–77#1772–8112%
Feb 7
Alabama logovs Alabama
L 92–96#2483–8863%
Feb 10
Vanderbilt logovs Vanderbilt
L 76–84#1379–8450%
Feb 14
Arkansas logoat Arkansas
L 75–88#1581–8818%
Feb 18
Mississippi State logoat Mississippi State
L 85–91#24783–7563%
Feb 21
Kentucky logovs Kentucky
W 75–74#3579–8061%
Feb 24
Oklahoma logoat Oklahoma
L 79–91#4682–8339%
Feb 28
Ole Miss logovs Ole Miss
L 79–85#11480–7488%
Mar 3
LSU logovs LSU
W 88–74#10484–7773%
Mar 7
Alabama logoat Alabama
L 84–96#2482–8927%
Mar 11
Mississippi State logovs Mississippi State
W 79–61#24783–7488%
Mar 12
Tennessee logovs Tennessee
L 62–72#1772–7931%
Mar 17
South Alabama logovs South Alabama
W 78–67#11086–6970%
Mar 22
Seattle logovs Seattle
W 91–85#10577–6886%
Mar 25
Nevada logovs Nevada
W 75–69#3981–7670%
Apr 2
Illinois State logovs Illinois State
W 88–66#9579–7359%
Apr 5
Tulsa logovs Tulsa
W 92–86#6084–8152%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#46#61#76#91#106
#55
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
This team is not in the 2025–26 bracket.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#38
KenPom rank#40
NET rank#38
Quality wins0.0#32
Rebound margin+2.8#64
Turnover margin+0.9#96
Assists per game12.4#247
Three-point margin-0.033#323
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Auburn

2025–26 • ATS
32
Picks on Auburn
74
Picks against
+3.1u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 16 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.