
Division 3 · BBMI #62
Wrightstown
11–15 · 8-8 confRegion 2A · WIAA #9 · BBMI #62
Tournament Probabilities
Regional Quarter
100.0%Regional Semis
100.0%Regional Finals
0%Sectional Semi
0%Sectional Final
0%State Qualifier
0%State Finalist
0%State Champion
0%Badges are assigned against fixed statistical thresholds, not relative to other teams. Tournament odds come from the bracket simulation — see the Tournament Pulse.
Played games
26| Date | Opponent | Div | Loc | Result | Team | Opp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2025 | 4 | Away | L | 42 | 55 | |
| 12/04/2025 | 2 | Away | L | 50 | 62 | |
| 12/09/2025 | 3 | Home | L | 52 | 70 | |
| 12/12/2025 | 3 | Away | W | 71 | 59 | |
| 12/13/2025 | 3 | Home | L | 43 | 77 | |
| 12/16/2025 | 3 | Home | W | 71 | 63 | |
| 12/18/2025 | 3 | Away | L | 44 | 67 | |
| 12/23/2025 | 4 | Home | L | 61 | 84 | |
| 12/29/2025 | 4 | Home | W | 66 | 55 | |
| 01/06/2026 | 2 | Home | W | 63 | 60 | |
| 01/08/2026 | 2 | Away | W | 50 | 45 | |
| 01/13/2026 | 2 | Home | W | 69 | 58 | |
| 01/16/2026 | 3 | Away | L | 51 | 63 | |
| 01/24/2026 | 1 | Home | W | 61 | 46 | |
| 01/27/2026 | 3 | Away | L | 39 | 79 | |
| 01/30/2026 | 3 | Home | W | 59 | 47 | |
| 02/03/2026 | 3 | Away | L | 47 | 57 | |
| 02/06/2026 | 3 | Home | L | 37 | 50 | |
| 02/09/2026 | 3 | Home | L | 49 | 52 | |
| 02/12/2026 | 2 | Home | L | 46 | 58 | |
| 02/14/2026 | 4 | Home | L | 41 | 73 | |
| 02/17/2026 | 2 | Away | W | 56 | 45 | |
| 02/20/2026 | 3 | Home | W | 68 | 59 | |
| 02/26/2026 | 2 | Away | L | 38 | 41 | |
| 03/03/2026 | 3 | Home | W | 50 | 40 | |
| 03/06/2026 | 3 | Home | L | 51 | 83 |
Opponents ranked in the BBMI top 25 are flagged in red.
How classification & tournament odds are built
Classification badges compare a team’s stats against fixed thresholds — a primary badge for its most dominant trait, plus up to three secondary badges. A team meeting no threshold is “Balanced.” Badges describe style; they don’t feed the ratings.
Tournament probabilities nest by round — State Champion ≤ State Finalist ≤ State Qualifier, and so on — from the bracket simulation using team ratings, seeding, and home-site advantage.
Wider error bars than the college models, since prep stats are self-reported and noisier.