
Division 5 · BBMI #40
Three Lakes
16–10 · 6-2 confRegion 2A · WIAA #3 · BBMI #40
Tournament Probabilities
Regional Quarter
100.0%Regional Semis
100.0%Regional Finals
100.0%Sectional Semi
0%Sectional Final
0%State Qualifier
0%State Finalist
0%State Champion
0%Badges are assigned against fixed statistical thresholds, not relative to other teams. Tournament odds come from the bracket simulation — see the Tournament Pulse.
Played games
26| Date | Opponent | Div | Loc | Result | Team | Opp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2025 | 3 | Away | L | 55 | 82 | |
| 12/05/2025 | 5 | Away | W | 82 | 39 | |
| 12/11/2025 | 3 | Home | W | 70 | 25 | |
| 12/15/2025 | 4 | Away | W | 62 | 48 | |
| 12/18/2025 | 4 | Home | L | 57 | 68 | |
| 01/02/2026 | 5 | Away | W | 75 | 36 | |
| 01/05/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 44 | 57 | |
| 01/09/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 39 | 65 | |
| 01/15/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 40 | 53 | |
| 01/17/2026 | 2 | Away | L | 61 | 82 | |
| 01/19/2026 | 4 | Away | W | 73 | 58 | |
| 01/20/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 79 | 48 | |
| 01/27/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 83 | 47 | |
| 01/29/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 89 | 35 | |
| 02/03/2026 | 4 | Home | W | 76 | 59 | |
| 02/05/2026 | 5 | Away | W | 92 | 68 | |
| 02/09/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 51 | 65 | |
| 02/12/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 83 | 52 | |
| 02/16/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 80 | 46 | |
| 02/19/2026 | Iron Mountain | 0 | Home | W | 82 | 75 |
| 02/20/2026 | 4 | Away | L | 54 | 80 | |
| 02/23/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 70 | 89 | |
| 02/26/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 71 | 65 | |
| 03/03/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 81 | 52 | |
| 03/06/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 58 | 51 | |
| 03/07/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 23 | 51 |
Opponents ranked in the BBMI top 25 are flagged in red.
How classification & tournament odds are built
Classification badges compare a team’s stats against fixed thresholds — a primary badge for its most dominant trait, plus up to three secondary badges. A team meeting no threshold is “Balanced.” Badges describe style; they don’t feed the ratings.
Tournament probabilities nest by round — State Champion ≤ State Finalist ≤ State Qualifier, and so on — from the bracket simulation using team ratings, seeding, and home-site advantage.
Wider error bars than the college models, since prep stats are self-reported and noisier.