Division 3 · BBMI #35
New Glarus
16–10 · 8-2 confRegion 3A · WIAA #5 · BBMI #35
Team Classification
Primary
Giant Slayers
Quality wins over top teams
Secondary
Pickpockets: Turnover creation masters
Scorchers: High-octane scoring offense
Sharpshooters: Deadly three-point shooting
Marksmen: Overall field goal precision
Glass Cleaners: Rebounding dominance
Tournament Probabilities
Regional Quarter
100.0%Regional Semis
100.0%Regional Finals
0%Sectional Semi
7.9%Sectional Final
3.9%State Qualifier
0.3%State Finalist
<0.1%State Champion
0%Badges are assigned against fixed statistical thresholds, not relative to other teams. Tournament odds come from the bracket simulation — see the Tournament Pulse.
Played games
26| Date | Opponent | Div | Loc | Result | Team | Opp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/28/2025 |  Evansville(#45) | 3 | Away | W | 62 | 53 |
| 12/02/2025 |  Columbus(#26) | 3 | Home | L | 45 | 65 |
| 12/05/2025 |  Brodhead(#90) | 4 | Away | W | 85 | 44 |
| 12/15/2025 |  Mineral Point(#19) | 3 | Away | W | 77 | 64 |
| 12/19/2025 |  Lakeside Lutheran(#12) | 3 | Away | L | 65 | 74 |
| 12/22/2025 |  Cuba City(#55) | 4 | Home | W | 74 | 58 |
| 12/30/2025 |  Barneveld(#11) | 5 | Home | W | 56 | 45 |
| 01/03/2026 |  Platteville(#51) | 3 | Home | W | 92 | 91 |
| 01/06/2026 |  Lake Mills(#1) | 3 | Home | L | 54 | 85 |
| 01/09/2026 |  Wisconsin Heights(#96) | 4 | Home | W | 89 | 38 |
| 01/10/2026 |  Dodgeville(#42) | 3 | Away | L | 70 | 76 |
| 01/15/2026 |  Waterloo(#82) | 4 | Home | W | 72 | 50 |
| 01/20/2026 |  Belleville(#68) | 4 | Away | W | 55 | 35 |
| 01/26/2026 |  Monroe(#16) | 2 | Away | L | 45 | 88 |
| 01/29/2026 |  Cambridge(#23) | 4 | Home | W | 65 | 56 |
| 02/02/2026 |  Poynette(#57) | 4 | Home | W | 61 | 58 |
| 02/06/2026 | Wisconsin Heights(#96) | 4 | Away | W | 75 | 30 |
| 02/09/2026 |  Lodi(#24) | 3 | Home | L | 66 | 73 |
| 02/14/2026 |  Marshall(#27) | 4 | Away | L | 74 | 76 |
| 02/17/2026 | Belleville(#68) | 4 | Home | W | 96 | 60 |
| 02/18/2026 | Waterloo(#82) | 4 | Away | W | 71 | 42 |
| 02/20/2026 | Marshall(#27) | 4 | Home | L | 66 | 68 |
| 02/23/2026 |  Darlington(#5) | 4 | Away | L | 67 | 93 |
| 02/26/2026 | Cambridge(#23) | 4 | Away | W | 52 | 49 |
| 03/03/2026 |  Viroqua(#95) | 3 | Home | W | 71 | 47 |
| 03/06/2026 |  Lancaster(#43) | 3 | Home | L | 58 | 71 |
Opponents ranked in the BBMI top 25 are flagged in red.
How classification & tournament odds are built
Classification badges compare a team’s stats against fixed thresholds — a primary badge for its most dominant trait, plus up to three secondary badges. A team meeting no threshold is “Balanced.” Badges describe style; they don’t feed the ratings.
Tournament probabilities nest by round — State Champion ≤ State Finalist ≤ State Qualifier, and so on — from the bracket simulation using team ratings, seeding, and home-site advantage.
Wider error bars than the college models, since prep stats are self-reported and noisier.