
Division 1 · BBMI #51
Manitowoc Lincoln
9–16 · 5-13 confRegion 2 · WIAA #16 · BBMI #51
Tournament Probabilities
Regional Quarter
100.0%Regional Semis
0%Regional Finals
0%Sectional Semi
0%Sectional Final
0%State Qualifier
0%State Finalist
0%State Champion
0%Badges are assigned against fixed statistical thresholds, not relative to other teams. Tournament odds come from the bracket simulation — see the Tournament Pulse.
Played games
25| Date | Opponent | Div | Loc | Result | Team | Opp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2025 | 2 | Home | L | 64 | 77 | |
| 12/02/2025 | 2 | Home | W | 85 | 81 | |
| 12/08/2025 | 2 | Home | W | 72 | 33 | |
| 12/12/2025 | 1 | Away | L | 54 | 69 | |
| 12/16/2025 | 2 | Away | W | 70 | 62 | |
| 12/19/2025 | 2 | Home | L | 63 | 77 | |
| 12/29/2025 | 1 | Home | W | 62 | 51 | |
| 01/02/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 55 | 69 | |
| 01/06/2026 | 1 | Away | L | 46 | 74 | |
| 01/09/2026 | 2 | Away | W | 72 | 53 | |
| 01/10/2026 | 1 | Away | W | 52 | 48 | |
| 01/13/2026 | 2 | Home | L | 44 | 55 | |
| 01/16/2026 | 2 | Home | L | 49 | 65 | |
| 01/20/2026 | 1 | Away | W | 59 | 36 | |
| 01/22/2026 | 1 | Away | L | 50 | 67 | |
| 01/24/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 43 | 51 | |
| 01/27/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 45 | 51 | |
| 01/30/2026 | 2 | Home | L | 74 | 83 | |
| 02/03/2026 | 2 | Home | W | 65 | 38 | |
| 02/06/2026 | 2 | Away | L | 47 | 76 | |
| 02/10/2026 | 2 | Away | L | 57 | 89 | |
| 02/13/2026 | 2 | Away | W | 63 | 58 | |
| 02/20/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 40 | 60 | |
| 02/26/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 26 | 52 | |
| 03/03/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 63 | 70 |
Opponents ranked in the BBMI top 25 are flagged in red.
How classification & tournament odds are built
Classification badges compare a team’s stats against fixed thresholds — a primary badge for its most dominant trait, plus up to three secondary badges. A team meeting no threshold is “Balanced.” Badges describe style; they don’t feed the ratings.
Tournament probabilities nest by round — State Champion ≤ State Finalist ≤ State Qualifier, and so on — from the bracket simulation using team ratings, seeding, and home-site advantage.
Wider error bars than the college models, since prep stats are self-reported and noisier.