
Division 5 · BBMI #73
La Farge
5–19 · 2-12 confRegion 3B · WIAA #12 · BBMI #73
Team Classification
Primary
Glass Cleaners
Rebounding dominance
Secondary
Pickpockets: Turnover creation masters
Tournament Probabilities
Regional Quarter
100.0%Regional Semis
0%Regional Finals
0%Sectional Semi
0%Sectional Final
0%State Qualifier
0%State Finalist
0%State Champion
0%Badges are assigned against fixed statistical thresholds, not relative to other teams. Tournament odds come from the bracket simulation — see the Tournament Pulse.
Played games
24| Date | Opponent | Div | Loc | Result | Team | Opp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2025 | 5 | Home | W | 68 | 61 | |
| 12/02/2025 | 5 | Away | L | 50 | 55 | |
| 12/05/2025 | 5 | Away | L | 55 | 64 | |
| 12/12/2025 | 5 | Home | L | 54 | 92 | |
| 12/22/2025 | 5 | Home | L | 25 | 69 | |
| 12/23/2025 | 5 | Away | W | 66 | 53 | |
| 01/02/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 63 | 65 | |
| 01/06/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 37 | 55 | |
| 01/09/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 80 | 33 | |
| 01/12/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 36 | 39 | |
| 01/15/2026 | 5 | Away | W | 60 | 44 | |
| 01/19/2026 | 4 | Away | W | 56 | 52 | |
| 01/20/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 63 | 72 | |
| 01/29/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 46 | 82 | |
| 02/02/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 36 | 69 | |
| 02/03/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 34 | 73 | |
| 02/06/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 47 | 49 | |
| 02/10/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 44 | 57 | |
| 02/12/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 64 | 76 | |
| 02/16/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 42 | 58 | |
| 02/17/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 52 | 71 | |
| 02/23/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 40 | 43 | |
| 02/26/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 62 | 71 | |
| 03/03/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 38 | 63 |
Opponents ranked in the BBMI top 25 are flagged in red.
How classification & tournament odds are built
Classification badges compare a team’s stats against fixed thresholds — a primary badge for its most dominant trait, plus up to three secondary badges. A team meeting no threshold is “Balanced.” Badges describe style; they don’t feed the ratings.
Tournament probabilities nest by round — State Champion ≤ State Finalist ≤ State Qualifier, and so on — from the bracket simulation using team ratings, seeding, and home-site advantage.
Wider error bars than the college models, since prep stats are self-reported and noisier.