
Division 1 · BBMI #35
Kenosha Bradford
15–11 · 7-5 confRegion 4 · WIAA #6 · BBMI #35
Tournament Probabilities
Regional Quarter
0%Regional Semis
100.0%Regional Finals
100.0%Sectional Semi
0%Sectional Final
0%State Qualifier
0%State Finalist
0%State Champion
0%Badges are assigned against fixed statistical thresholds, not relative to other teams. Tournament odds come from the bracket simulation — see the Tournament Pulse.
Played games
26| Date | Opponent | Div | Loc | Result | Team | Opp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2025 | 1 | Away | L | 74 | 79 | |
| 12/05/2025 | 1 | Away | W | 87 | 72 | |
| 12/06/2025 | 3 | Home | L | 54 | 69 | |
| 12/12/2025 | 1 | Home | L | 60 | 67 | |
| 12/15/2025 | 4 | Home | W | 95 | 66 | |
| 12/18/2025 | 1 | Away | W | 64 | 60 | |
| 12/23/2025 | 1 | Home | W | 71 | 61 | |
| 12/27/2025 | 2 | Home | W | 74 | 69 | |
| 01/06/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 55 | 57 | |
| 01/09/2026 | 1 | Away | W | 68 | 64 | |
| 01/12/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 61 | 71 | |
| 01/16/2026 | 2 | Home | W | 71 | 61 | |
| 01/27/2026 | 1 | Away | L | 56 | 79 | |
| 01/30/2026 | 1 | Home | W | 88 | 60 | |
| 02/03/2026 | 1 | Away | W | 71 | 55 | |
| 02/05/2026 | 1 | Home | W | 81 | 67 | |
| 02/07/2026 | 2 | Away | W | 88 | 73 | |
| 02/10/2026 | 1 | Away | W | 73 | 70 | |
| 02/12/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 70 | 83 | |
| 02/14/2026 | 4 | Home | L | 69 | 72 | |
| 02/18/2026 | 1 | Home | W | 77 | 73 | |
| 02/21/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 75 | 86 | |
| 02/23/2026 | 2 | Home | W | 77 | 63 | |
| 02/26/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 69 | 73 | |
| 03/06/2026 | 1 | Home | W | 105 | 71 | |
| 03/07/2026 | 1 | Home | L | 67 | 83 |
Opponents ranked in the BBMI top 25 are flagged in red.
How classification & tournament odds are built
Classification badges compare a team’s stats against fixed thresholds — a primary badge for its most dominant trait, plus up to three secondary badges. A team meeting no threshold is “Balanced.” Badges describe style; they don’t feed the ratings.
Tournament probabilities nest by round — State Champion ≤ State Finalist ≤ State Qualifier, and so on — from the bracket simulation using team ratings, seeding, and home-site advantage.
Wider error bars than the college models, since prep stats are self-reported and noisier.