
Division 5 · BBMI #91
Eau Claire Immanuel Lutheran
6–17 · 5-15 confRegion 1A · WIAA #11 · BBMI #91
Team Classification
Primary
Pickpockets
Turnover creation masters
Secondary
Fortress: Elite point margin dominance
Tournament Probabilities
Regional Quarter
100.0%Regional Semis
0%Regional Finals
0%Sectional Semi
0%Sectional Final
0%State Qualifier
0%State Finalist
0%State Champion
0%Badges are assigned against fixed statistical thresholds, not relative to other teams. Tournament odds come from the bracket simulation — see the Tournament Pulse.
Played games
23| Date | Opponent | Div | Loc | Result | Team | Opp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2025 | 5 | Away | W | 60 | 35 | |
| 12/04/2025 | 4 | Home | L | 31 | 50 | |
| 12/06/2025 | 4 | Away | L | 39 | 60 | |
| 12/12/2025 | 4 | Home | L | 49 | 64 | |
| 01/13/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 50 | 55 | |
| 01/16/2026 | 4 | Away | L | 35 | 55 | |
| 01/19/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 51 | 52 | |
| 01/22/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 59 | 58 | |
| 01/24/2026 | 5 | Home | W | 64 | 58 | |
| 01/26/2026 | 4 | Away | W | 45 | 43 | |
| 01/27/2026 | 4 | Away | W | 58 | 49 | |
| 01/30/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 57 | 66 | |
| 02/02/2026 | 4 | Away | L | 51 | 79 | |
| 02/05/2026 | 4 | Home | L | 41 | 53 | |
| 02/07/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 42 | 61 | |
| 02/09/2026 | 4 | Away | L | 38 | 43 | |
| 02/12/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 58 | 68 | |
| 02/13/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 45 | 53 | |
| 02/17/2026 | 4 | Home | L | 62 | 72 | |
| 02/20/2026 | 5 | Away | W | 67 | 61 | |
| 02/23/2026 | 4 | Home | L | 48 | 49 | |
| 02/26/2026 | 5 | Away | L | 65 | 82 | |
| 03/03/2026 | 5 | Home | L | 47 | 58 |
Opponents ranked in the BBMI top 25 are flagged in red.
How classification & tournament odds are built
Classification badges compare a team’s stats against fixed thresholds — a primary badge for its most dominant trait, plus up to three secondary badges. A team meeting no threshold is “Balanced.” Badges describe style; they don’t feed the ratings.
Tournament probabilities nest by round — State Champion ≤ State Finalist ≤ State Qualifier, and so on — from the bracket simulation using team ratings, seeding, and home-site advantage.
Wider error bars than the college models, since prep stats are self-reported and noisier.