Team Pages/OVC/Tennessee State
Tennessee State logo
OVC • 2025–26 SEASON

Tennessee State

Record 23-10vs line 10–6 ATSLast L 74–108 at Iowa StateTournament 15 seed, Round of 64
#160
BBMI rank
+19.9
Rating
#191
KenPom
#172
NET
Tennessee State logo
Tennessee State
#160 • +19.9 • OVC
FRI MAR 20
74 108
final score
Iowa State
#9 • +28.5neutral
Iowa State logo
+11.5
Model line
+24.5
Market line
+13.0
Edge · Premium ATS
14%
Win probability
Tennessee State 14%Iowa State 86%
The 2025–26 season is complete. The board returns in November.

Schedule & projections

line and win prob from the board, where it priced the game
DATEOPPONENTRESULTOPP RKPROJWIN %WIN PROB
Nov 4
FB
vs Fisk Bulldogs
W 101–50
Nov 9
Belmont logoat Belmont
L 79–87#51
Nov 12
OA
vs Oakwood Ambassadors
W 114–76
Nov 16
Western Kentucky logoat Western Kentucky
L 82–95#144
Nov 21
Tennessee logoat Tennessee
L 60–89#17
Nov 25
UNC Asheville logoat UNC Asheville
W 75–73#277
Nov 29
TWB
vs Tennessee Wesleyan Bulldogs
W 98–77
Nov 30
Chattanooga logoat Chattanooga
W 70–64#241
Dec 3
Alabama A&M logoat Alabama A&M
L 53–80#255
Dec 13
UNLV logoat UNLV
W 63–60#176
Dec 18
Tennessee-Martin logovs Tennessee-Martin
W 78–71#190
Dec 20
Southeast Missouri State logovs Southeast Missouri State
L 82–91#219
Dec 30
Tennessee Tech logoat Tennessee Tech
W 88–76#270
Jan 3
Little Rock logoat Little Rock
W 84–79#301
Jan 8
Western Illinois logoat Western Illinois
W 90–68#35984–6491%
Jan 10
Eastern Illinois logoat Eastern Illinois
L 70–74#27177–6856%
Jan 15
Morehead State logovs Morehead State
W 105–100#21281–7573%
Jan 17
Southern Indiana logovs Southern Indiana
W 73–67#34780–6697%
Jan 22
SIU-Edwardsville logoat SIU-Edwardsville
L 66–74#18573–6933%
Jan 24
Lindenwood logoat Lindenwood
W 96–86#23278–7222%
Jan 29
Little Rock logovs Little Rock
W 70–63#30181–7181%
Feb 2
Tennessee Tech logovs Tennessee Tech
L 85–90#27081–7286%
Feb 5
Eastern Illinois logovs Eastern Illinois
W 77–68#27178–6776%
Feb 7
Western Illinois logovs Western Illinois
W 83–56#35985–6497%
Feb 12
Southern Indiana logoat Southern Indiana
W 73–71#34779–6686%
Feb 14
Morehead State logoat Morehead State
L 86–94#21280–7640%
Feb 19
Lindenwood logovs Lindenwood
W 89–80#23279–7261%
Feb 21
SIU-Edwardsville logovs SIU-Edwardsville
W 80–53#18574–6961%
Feb 26
Southeast Missouri State logoat Southeast Missouri State
W 79–71#21976–7358%
Feb 28
Tennessee-Martin logoat Tennessee-Martin
W 67–42#19072–6946%
Mar 6
Tennessee-Martin logovs Tennessee-Martin
W 68–55#19073–6952%
Mar 7
Morehead State logovs Morehead State
W 93–67#21281–7557%
Mar 20
Iowa State logovs Iowa State
L 74–108#964–8614%

Ranking over time

weekly · place of 365
#127#150#173#196#217
#160
Jan 27Feb 3Feb 10Feb 17Feb 24Mar 3Mar 10Mar 17Mar 24Mar 31Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

14 weekly snapshots, frozen on Tuesdays while the sport is playing. The series stops where the season did and resumes when the sport does.

NCAA tournament

Pulse →
15
Seed
Midwest
Region
Round of 64
Finish
The bracket is resolved, so this is the result rather than a probability. It becomes an odds card again when the file carries fractions.

Regular-season wins

not published
This sport has no season simulation, so there is no distribution of win totals to draw.

Profile

Strength of schedule#172
KenPom rank#191
NET rank#172
Quality wins-49.5#86
Rebound margin+1.7#101
Turnover margin+1.6#63
Assists per game12.3#259
Three-point margin-0.004#208
The mock asks for offensive and defensive efficiency, tempo and experience. This sport publishes none of them: the feed carries raw shooting and rebound rates, which are not opponent-adjusted efficiency and must not wear that heading. The rankings board drops the same columns for the same reason.

BBMI picks on Tennessee State

2025–26 • ATS
52
Picks on Tennessee State
54
Picks against
+3.1u
Net, flat 1u
ON took this team, AGAINST took its opponent. This sport does not store the side by name, so it is read from which way the model’s line sits against the market, and a game counts only once it clears the published edge floor. 16 graded picks.
Probabilities may not add to 100%. All results are model projections, not guarantees.